User talk:Amdonaldson/personal sandbox

Adam--I created your sandbox in your area--the old link attempted to create one in the accessing user's area. If you don't like it the way it is, just revert the change. Webster Newbold (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions by Adam and Thomas need to be identified. And sources need to be listed! -Webster Newbold (talk) 21:43, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article status--Sunday 11/20

Knowledgeables--I'm impressed with the way you turned this article around and put out a solid product, although you may have to argue for its notability after it goes up. I'm assuming everyone's work is accounted for at this point? It wasn't clear to me from the Talk page who finally ended up doing what, so I'll be looking in the memos for guidance.

As usual with most articles, the referencing needs to be touched up and the format corrected in some of them so that it can be published with hope of success. I've corrected notes 1 though 5 and 7 through 11 so you can see the formatting code and duplicate it to show more information. Notes 1, 3, and 9 I did with the simple manual method, putting basic info between ref tags. The other notes have more info, so I used the "cite" template at the top of the editing box. If Templates aren't showing, click on "Cite" and they'll show up on the left. Use the "cite web" template for online sources; put the cursor where the citation should go (after punctuation) and click on "cite web." Put the relevant info in the boxes, and click to indicate current date. The "work" is the name of the Web site for our purposes; the title is the title of the page you are referring to. Click insert and it will put the right code into the text. Try to adjust the other notes (those responsible for them) and I'll help out if you get stuck.