User talk:Amdk8800

Hi Amdk8800. I redirected "Internet Symphony No. 1" to "The Internet Symphony No. 1", but the title should remain with "The", because that is the name of the piece. I also redirected "Internet Symphony No.1"(with no space between No. and 1) to "The Internet Symphony No. 1"

Georgexu316 (talk) 16:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Amdk8800, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

And don't forget, the edit summary is your friend. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection of "chirality (biology)" to "chirality (chemistry)"

Hi Fan Wu, as it currently stands, the "biology" article merely duplicates what is in the "chemistry" one. If you can expand it into something that gives its own slant, that would justify having a separate article (but note that you have to steer away from original research on Wikipedia). There are two possibilities: you can do this rapidly. In that case we can leave the article and other editors that know more about these things than I do will come in and help you. However, if you cannot do this rapidly (within the next 2 days or so), we should redirect the article to "chemistry" for now and copy its contents to a "sandbox" that you can create as a subpage of your user page where you can work on it. Once it is ready, you then copy it back to "biology". Hope this helps. Happy editing! --Crusio (talk) 09:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I just noticed that although you reverted the redirect, the article is still in its original state, duplicating the information in the "chemistry" article (which is also much more detailed). I will now redirect it to the "chemistry" article, if you want to, you can work in your userspace on it until it is ready for prime time. --Crusio (talk) 17:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]