User talk:Amdecann

December 2013

Hello, I'm Skarz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Media influence, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Skarz (talk) 02:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Consumer behaviour, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Skarz (talk) 02:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Organizational communication. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Skarz (talk) 02:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Media influence, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Skarz (talk) 03:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]