User talk:Ambriella

July 2024

Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Yabani without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 14:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also make sure that your edit summaries are good descriptions of the edit and not misleading. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 14:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiDionysius sayfayı düzenliyordum Ambriella (talk) 14:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiDionysius hatalı bilgileri düzeltiyorum Ambriella (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. This especially applies when you're replacing information that is sourced; you need to explain and provide evidence for that previous source having been wrong. AntiDionysius (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiDionysius sayfanın orijinal dilindeki bilgileri ekledim zaten.

hatalı bilgileri ve yazım yanlışlarını kaldırdım Ambriella (talk) 14:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 14:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiDionysius

I understood, but I did not add or remove information, I just edited the page because it was wrong. If you look at the original language of the page, you will understand, thank you. Ambriella (talk) 14:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you were editing it because you say it is wrong. But that editing involved both removing information and adding new information. That's what editing is. You also deleted a citation. If you're going to do that, you need to explain why the information and citation you delete are wrong, and provide a new citation for the things that you add. AntiDionysius (talk) 14:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiDionysius How can I do it? Can you help me because I want to fix it? Ambriella (talk) 14:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which part do you need help with? AntiDionysius (talk) 14:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiDionysius The page is about a Turkish TV series and the leading characters are written incorrectly and there are a lot of spelling mistakes. I want to correct the leading characters. I also need help on another issue, I cannot add a language to another page. Ambriella (talk) 14:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 19:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ambriella (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked from en-WP even though I don't do puppetry, I need help on how to fix it. I request that it be checked again. Because I was careful not to violate any rules. I want my IP address to be checked regarding puppetry, this block was unjust. Ambriella (talk) 10:07, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Between the deleted article Bertan Asllani, and your overlapping edit history at Yabani, it's clear that there is some sort of coordinated editing between yourself and User:Narcen99. You'll need to adequately explain your connection with that editor in order for an appeal to be considered. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admins do not have access to IP addresses, and checkusers(who do) do not conduct checks at the request of a user(see WP:CHECKME). 331dot (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]