User talk:AmberHopeEyre

Welcome

Hello AmberHopeEyre and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AmberHopeEyre. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback.
Message added 17:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ukexpat (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your message on my talk page

Thanks for the message. Couple of points: if there is an existing article that contains what you believe to be inaccurate information, please be bold and edit the article to fix it, but remember you must have reliable sources as defined in WP:RS to support your edits. If the edits are likely to be contentious, please discuss them first on the article's talk page to gain consensus with other interested editors. As for what needs to be in an article to avoid deletion - the foundation of Wikipedia is notability, and for people that is discussed at WP:BIO. So the article needs to describe how the subject is notable and, most importantly, cite sources to support notability. I would suggest that you take a look at a few other biographical articles to see how they are written. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 17:48, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adam H.

I tagged your article as unreferenced, and resembling a fan-site because:

a) there are no references. I would suggest doing a google news search, its an easy way to get reputable sources on the quick.

b) there are terms like "mega hit" and "hugely successful", terms like these are nebulous.

read this: Wikipedia:Citing_sources to learn how to add references. Vinithehat (talk) 17:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

one more thing: Thanks for contributing! Vinithehat (talk) 17:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Adam Hurstfield, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Adam Hurstfield was changed by AmberHopeEyre (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-11-06T20:28:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam H.

A tag has been placed on Adam H., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cassandra 73 (talk) 20:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]