User talk:Amazingsam123

Welcome!

Hello, Amazingsam123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PoetVeches (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amazingsam123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Amazingsam123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help.

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

PoetVeches (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Amazingsam123 Talk

Welcome please leave any messages or questions if you have I like to make new friends :)

Deletion discussion about Chetu

Hello, Amazingsam123

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Lord Bolingbroke and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Chetu, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chetu .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lord Bolingbroke}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord Bolingbroke:

Hello Lord Bolingbroke,

It's nice to meet you too. I am trying to gather more information about this page, yes I have created the page and it is weak with the referencing stand point I would go ahead and keep on working on this article and I would really appreciate if you would help me along the way with the referencing and guide me as you are a senior and you have a lot of information in the aspect of Wikipedia guidelines and I hopefully be putting more references by Tuesday or Wednesday. But you are more than welcome to guide me and help me to build this article further and If you would like you can send me an email directly at amazingsam12345@gmail.com

I am looking forward for your reply.

@Lord Bolingbroke:

{{Re|Lord Bolingbroke}} If you would advise me what would be the some good example of references I think right now the only problem is referencing, correct me if I am wrong furthermore, I thought it would be easier for me to start the article with a few lines and a few references and build it up a good article with time, please advise me on this if this is not a right way to go ahead with.

I would appreciate everyone to help me with this page so I can learn and would not make those mistakes again.

Awaiting your reply

Amazingsam123 (talk) 03:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out Amazingsam123. As explained in Wikipedia's general notability guideline, articles should be based on reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The main issue with the sources currently cited at Chetu is that they are not independent—they're press releases, the company's own website, or interviews with the company founder. If you can find sources that aren't produced by people associated with Chetu, that would help to establish the company's notability. Bear in mind that the sources also need to provide significant coverage of the company. I saw that you added Chetu's profile from Bloomberg, but that is just a simple listing of information that doesn't provide significant coverage, as described at WP:CORPDEPTH. I'd be happy to help if you have further questions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 04:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord Bolingbroke: Sure, let me find a few articles or a book which will be from a neutral person and I will reference the article accordingly. Thanks for guiding me.

Amazingsam123 (talk) 04:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord Bolingbroke:

I am quite busy these days I have tried to find primary sources for the article such as books, news articles but couldn't find enough references to support this so I think instead of deleting the article we can put it in draft so if I could find something to support it so I will be able to go ahead and move the article then. What do you say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amazingsam123 (talk • contribs) 06:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned below, if you want to have the article moved to draftspace, you will need to request this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chetu. Since the deletion discussion is already open, it should be allowed to run its course with the article remaining in mainspace. Even if there is no consensus to draftify the article, administrators are usually amenable to giving copies of deleted material, so you can probably have a copy of the article restored to your userspace or via email.

I would also like to say that I appreciate your willingness to communicate and your understanding of Wikipedia's sourcing requirements. Wikipedia's guidelines regarding notability, sourcing, etc., can be rather arcane, so don't be discouraged by the deletion nominations for your recent articles. I hope that you will continue to contribute as you become more familiar with Wikipedia's norms and guidelines. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 17:56, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Robert E. StewartDSC12131231156.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Robert E. StewartDSC12131231156.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MifterBot:

Thank you I have resolved the issue.

Amazingsam123 (talk)

Nomination of Ronald E. Stewart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronald E. Stewart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald E. Stewart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Robert E. StewartDSC12131231156.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Robert E. StewartDSC12131231156.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:51, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Lord Bolingbroke

Thank you for the details I have put the details on the file.

Amazingsam123 (talk) 17:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saying that you found the photograph on the LinkedIn page of a relative is not enough information to evaluate its copyright status. Who took the photograph and where was it originally published? Could you at least provide a URL to the LinkedIn page? Unless additional source information is provided, the file is still eligible for deletion. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 14:28, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Lord Bolingbroke

I will have that added shortly.

Amazingsam123 (talk) 16:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About how to wiki-link

Hi, there! I see You cannot write wiki-link (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vanila_Singh&diff=926160434&oldid=926056938) on article Vanila Singh. Wiki-link is linking inside Wikipedia. First, You must search for if the title You want to wiki-link existing on Wikipedia, for example, you want to wiki-link "Mountain Everest", you write in Wikipedia browser: "Mountain Everest", but there no such entry, but there is entry called "Mount Everest", so then You write "Mount Everest" and then place wiki-link Mount Everest (wiki-link will be blue). But if You write wiki-link on wrong title "Mountain Everest", it will not work Mountain Everest (wiki-link will be red). Read details in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking. Good luck in learning! Try also Sandbox, where you can experiment with Wikitext (that is in top menu of Wikipedia)! PoetVeches (talk) 16:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know I will keep that in mind for future :)

Amazingsam123 (talk) 16:59, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Amazingsam123! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- PoetVeches (talk) 17:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teague Egan (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many statements lack citations therefore can't be verified.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teague Egan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Teague Egan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draftifying

Hi Amazingsam123. I don't mean to hound you, but I have reverted your recent draftifications of Chetu and Ronald E. Stewart. These moves were out of process, since the articles are currently being discussed at Articles for Deletion. If you would like to have the articles moved to draftspace or your userspace, please leave a comment at the respective deletion discussions so that other users (particularly the closing administrator) will be aware and can voice their opinions. Let me know if you have any questions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 06:09, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:Lord boilingbroke thank you for letting me know I just couldn't find enough references to support but thank You I will keep this in mind for future reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amazingsam123 (talk • contribs) 06:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Energyx

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Energyx has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a company, corporation or organization that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MER-C 15:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

DGG ( talk ) 16:57, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]