User talk:Amaury Dehoux

Welcome!

Hello, Amaury Dehoux, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unified growth theory

Hello Amaury Dehoux, thank you for your interest in improving this article. However, it seems like lowercase is commonly used to refer to the theory in regular prose (aside from titles and headers). If you disagree, please feel free to discuss a suggested move on the article's talkpage Talk:Unified growth theory to gain a consensus for one of the spelling variants (see also WP:TITLE for Wikipedia's article naming criteria). If you need help, please feel free to ask or post at WP:Teahouse, a good forum for all editing-related questions. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 16:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Amaury Dehoux. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Unified growth theory, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 01:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Unified growth theory. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 17:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with the removal, please discuss the issue at Talk:Unified growth theory instead of re-adding disputed promotional content. Also, please disclose your possible connection to the topic (and thus a possible conflict of interest), as requested in the previous message. Thank you for your consideration. GermanJoe (talk) 17:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Your additions to Economic growth and Effects of economic inequality have been removed, as it appears you added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:36, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unified Growth Theory (book) (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Milowent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We already have an article on Unified growth theory, shouldn't this be addressed here? We don't need large sections on the reception of the book, unless it made a bestseller list. Now sometimes a book on a theory has a separate article, e.g., The Columbian Exchange, but it depends on prominence and what is best for readers. I am thinking a paragraph about the book in the theory article may be the best way to organize. Galor's page may be another good place.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unified Growth Theory (book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Unified Growth Theory (book), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Milowent • ^hasspoken 16:57, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amaury Dehoux! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Milowent • ^hasspoken 16:57, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Unified Growth Theory (book)

Hello, Amaury Dehoux. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Unified Growth Theory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 00:48, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]