User talk:Amaury/2018/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Amaury. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
@Geraldo Perez, IJBall, and MPFitz1968: This one definitely has to be WP:TOOSOON, right? Amaury (talk | contribs) 13:33, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Very, very borderline, though the (minimal) sourcing used there may actually better than at some of the articles we discussed in April. Again, I don't have time right now to WP:AfD stuff, but I'm not sure this would survive at AfD in its current form... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:51, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Seem to have only one notable role so a BOLD redirect to that part of the article with a note of not meeting NACTOR and TOOSOON should be sufficient for now. If the redirect is undone, an AfD would be reasonable. When the actual film becomes real and is released then NACTOR might be met and with a major role other reliable sources should be found that talk about her. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Geraldo Perez I have taken your advice, and converted this to a redirect, citing this discussion. I basically agree with you that, at the current time, Wylie is too borderline to merit a standalone article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Amaury – note that I have done the same with Ariana Greenblatt: the editor in question did create a draft at Draft:Ariana Greenblatt, but didn't really listen to my advice. Greenblatt pretty clearly does not merit an article, based on what is at the draft currently. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
An editor left a request at Talk:Andi Mack about having a standalone article about her rather than the redirect to Andi Mack, but I pointed to this discussion and indicated it's WP:TOOSOON. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
@Geraldo Perez and IJBall: And here we go again. Whee! Doesn't seem to be any different than before. Also a bunch of pointless edits to I Didn't Do It. Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- User:Philip J Fry took care of this. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- That will continue to happen and is fairly expected. It is one of the reasons I think redirects to projects for non-notable actors is a bad idea, but I am a minority holding this view. Intensity is low enough to just be mildly irritating. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Cleanup project for MOS:TV articles
I've finally gotten around to your request to do MOS:TV "clean up" (e.g. reordering sections) at the articles listed in your sandbox. I just did the series listed "A" thru "D". I'll try to get to the rest soon-ish. P.S. I have not touched the "Plot" vs. "Premise" header issue – I will leave that for you to tackle (though it does look like a number of them are incorrected listed as "Plot" when they should be "Premise"...). P.P.S. This kind of thing would go easier, if you directly linked to your sandbox from somewhere like your userpage!... 
--IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: On my tablet right now, but will do. For now, User:Amaury/sandbox. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall:
Done. User:Amaury#Other Pages. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- Finished through "H" now. Incidentally, the idea that 'Critical', 'Ratings' and 'Awards and nominations' "have" to be put under 'Reception' is a "take it or leave it" proposition, IMO – some articles do work better that way, but some do not. I certainly would not object if somebody took 'Ratings' and 'Awards and nominations' back up a 'header level' at some of these articles that I've just "cleaned"... FWIW. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- And now done through "L". Note that I skipped Jessie (2011 TV series) entirely – that one requires more than just a quick "drive-by" cleanup, and will probably require some thought on how best to handle it... OTOH, I think Liv and Maddie is better now.
--IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- I'll work on a second, more thorough general cleanup of at least the parent article today to make things easier. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- BTW, Lab Rats (U.S. TV series) arguably needs a 'Ratings' table, though that will be complicated by the fact that there are "gaps" in the ratings listed as List of Lab Rats episodes. FWIW... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:40, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- I'll work on a second, more thorough general cleanup of at least the parent article today to make things easier. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- And now done through "N". --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Done. I've gone through the entire first list. A few I left unchanged. Most I "fixed" as per MOS:TV (suggestions). As I said, I've "punted" on Jessie for now, as that needs more than just "simple" cleanup work, IMO... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Unless I'm missing something or I'm listing something you did get or you already got earlier, of the ones that could use cleanup, other than Jessie, you also skipped 100 Things to Do Before High School, Jagger Eaton's Mega Life, Andi Mack, Keep It Spotless, Paradise Run, Star Falls, The Dude Perfect Show, and Walk the Prank. Either those are already good or you skipped them for other reasons, in which case I can take care of them if needed. Also, I take it Stuck in the Middle is one of those where Ratings, Awards, etc. makes more sense as standalone? Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- The ones I left were "close enough" to not bother with (i.e. they were basically already MOS:TV-compliant, or deviated in ways I didn't think were worth "fixing"). As for when I folded those sections under 'Reception' or not really varied from article to article – I did it in those case where I thought it worked better/made more sense. Sometimes that came down to a "feeling" of whether the associated subsection tables were "long" or "short". [shrug] --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: I've taken care of the ones you didn't get that I mentioned above, except for two. Please correct any errors I may have made: Special:Contributions/Amaury. Jagger Eaton's Mega Life was already good. As for Andi Mack, is that one where'd you put "Ratings" and "Awards" under a "Reception" section or leave them as standalone? Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- With Andi Mack, Mack Chat is the equivalent of a "spin-off", so it goes at the bottom of the article – I'm also unconvinced that Mack Chat is notable, and won't believe it is until I see independent sourcing mentioning it (IOW, the section should probably be cut). I did bundle those two sections under 'Reception' – in fact, I would say Andi Mack is in desperate need of the addition of a 'Critical [reception]' section under 'Reception' as well, as there is no way this show hasn't gotten multiple reviews in independent media... Beyond that, I don't see any problems in what you did. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: On the subject, the entire Plot section could really use a good copy-editing as virtually all of it reads rather clunky, and the first sentence doesn't even make sense to me. Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: By the way, for critical reception, should the section be titled "Critical" or "Critical response"? I've usually seen the latter, but I've noticed you've used the former with this latest cleanup project, and I assume there's a reason for that. Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:38, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- Either is probably OK, though as 'Critical' is actually pretty much "Critical reception", either that or 'Critical response' seems redundant to me in the same way 'Main cast' as a heading under 'Cast' is redundant, so I personally largely prefer just 'Critical' as the subsection title. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:08, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: We finally got our critical section for Andi Mack.
Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:32, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- FTR, that section needs to contain a lot more than the Cyrus stuff – afterall, the show is not titled "Cyrus Goodman"... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: LOL, agreed! Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:08, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- FTR, that section needs to contain a lot more than the Cyrus stuff – afterall, the show is not titled "Cyrus Goodman"... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: We finally got our critical section for Andi Mack.
- Either is probably OK, though as 'Critical' is actually pretty much "Critical reception", either that or 'Critical response' seems redundant to me in the same way 'Main cast' as a heading under 'Cast' is redundant, so I personally largely prefer just 'Critical' as the subsection title. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:08, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- With Andi Mack, Mack Chat is the equivalent of a "spin-off", so it goes at the bottom of the article – I'm also unconvinced that Mack Chat is notable, and won't believe it is until I see independent sourcing mentioning it (IOW, the section should probably be cut). I did bundle those two sections under 'Reception' – in fact, I would say Andi Mack is in desperate need of the addition of a 'Critical [reception]' section under 'Reception' as well, as there is no way this show hasn't gotten multiple reviews in independent media... Beyond that, I don't see any problems in what you did.
- @IJBall: I've taken care of the ones you didn't get that I mentioned above, except for two. Please correct any errors I may have made: Special:Contributions/Amaury. Jagger Eaton's Mega Life was already good. As for Andi Mack, is that one where'd you put "Ratings" and "Awards" under a "Reception" section or leave them as standalone? Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- The ones I left were "close enough" to not bother with (i.e. they were basically already MOS:TV-compliant, or deviated in ways I didn't think were worth "fixing"). As for when I folded those sections under 'Reception' or not really varied from article to article – I did it in those case where I thought it worked better/made more sense. Sometimes that came down to a "feeling" of whether the associated subsection tables were "long" or "short". [shrug] --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Unless I'm missing something or I'm listing something you did get or you already got earlier, of the ones that could use cleanup, other than Jessie, you also skipped 100 Things to Do Before High School, Jagger Eaton's Mega Life, Andi Mack, Keep It Spotless, Paradise Run, Star Falls, The Dude Perfect Show, and Walk the Prank. Either those are already good or you skipped them for other reasons, in which case I can take care of them if needed. Also, I take it Stuck in the Middle is one of those where Ratings, Awards, etc. makes more sense as standalone? Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
@IJBall, Geraldo Perez, and MPFitz1968: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Jessie (2011 TV series)#Crossovers section, and other article cleanup issues. IJBall, when you say, As I said, I've "punted" on Jessie for now, as that needs more than just "simple" cleanup work, IMO...
, I assume you're referring to the whole crossover situation? Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:35, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
@IJBall: I believe this is what you had in mind based on the Jessie talk page: User:Amaury/sandbox/Jessie (2011 TV series). Feel free to change anything that still could be changed. For example, if the sub-sections of the main sections, like Production, should be in a different order. Or if one of the main sections isn't placed in the right spot. I'll then take it from there and fill everything in. (Although I won't "publish" it until we get the characters sorted to determine if we need a separate LOC or not.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Amaury: With that version, 'Episodes' goes above 'Cast'. Also, the 'Spinoff' and 'Indian adaptation' sections don't go "under" 'In other media' – they either go above or below it (will need to check some other articles on this point to be sure..). And I'm still not sure what to do with the 'Controversy' section, though I think what you've done with it there is fine... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: For the crossovers, I'm thinking we don't even need a section for each crossover—seems pointless, in my opinion, for such short prose for each crossover—just a separate paragraph, like so: User:Amaury/sandbox/Jessie#Crossovers. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:18, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- I don't have a strong opinion on that – I don't mind the subheads for those, but they probably aren't necessary either... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: For the crossovers, I'm thinking we don't even need a section for each crossover—seems pointless, in my opinion, for such short prose for each crossover—just a separate paragraph, like so: User:Amaury/sandbox/Jessie#Crossovers. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:18, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
I just cleaned up Sam & Cat (which is actually not in your "list"...) – anyway, you may want to take a second look at it yourself, to see if you have any other ideas or thoughts on it. FWIW... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Ugh... We've got a mess on our hands here – Lab Rats premiered as a 1-hour premiere airing (i.e, with both "Parts 1 and 2" together). The original Disney XD press release from Jan. 9, 2012 confirms this, and while Zap2It is somewhat confusing on the point, both it and The Futon Critic also confirm this. That means the LoE for Lab Rats may be numbered wrong, from the beginning! Pinging Geraldo Perez to this discussion as well, because we need to figure out if we should "fix" this, or leave well enough alone at this point. Note: This may also be true of the series finale, "The Vanishing"... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: "Crush, Chop, and Burn" is sold as a single episode while "The Vanishing" is sold as two separate episodes. The latter is definitely correct as it was supposed to be a double-length special, but was changed last-minute, and even The Futon Critic still incorrectly has it as one entry. See Talk:List of Lab Rats episodes#Production codes as the whole "The Vanishing" ordeal was mentioned then. The Futon Critic also has one entry for the series premiere. As for Zap2it, that's what happens with the double-length specials. Take a look at Lab Rats: Elite Force' "Home Sweet Home". The original airing was September 24, 2016. The airings on September 26, 2016, and September 27, 2016, were parted repeats. Because they were parted, Zap2it took that to mean "new" in a sense, I guess. Likewise with other similar situations. This seems to be what happened with Lab Rats for its premiere. The one on Zap2it without "Part" in it was the original airing. It was later split for reruns, with Part 1 airing later that same night and Part 2 airing the next day. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:25, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Following up on Talk:List of Lab Rats episodes#Production codes – finding this in the U.S.C.O. database is tricky: you have to search under both "Lab Rats" and "Disney Lab Rats" to find all the episodes. But U.S.C.O. seems to further confirm: the pilot (and "Bionic Showdown") should be combined (i.e. Parts 1 & 2 "counted" as "one episode"), but "The Vanishing" is two... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Definitely seems now like what I mentioned above is what happened, then. It was shown as a double-length episode on February 27, 2012—the original airing. It was then parted for reruns, with the Part 1 rerun airing later that night and the Part 2 rerun airing the next day. It just confused some people, I guess, with how it was listed on Zap2it at the time since that was the old website layout back then. It's actually a little easier to tell now with the new Zap2it website layout. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:08, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- In the original discussion people who viewed it said it was aired as two separate episodes back to back and, I assume, with full credits for each part. This the way it is listed now. If that was incorrect and there actually was a full merge with a single set of credits it would be one episode and it is not correctly documented in the table. Seems that is how it is sold. I suggest noting the problem on the talk page and seeing what others say, if interested, and suggest merging in the description. Leave it alone for now as that require renumbering all the episodes now. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez: Taking care of the numbering and inbound links would not be a problem for me. Thankfully, this isn't like the whole iCarly fiasco. @MPFitz1968 and Nyuszika7H: Do either of you have access to this episode in one-hour form? If not, I may purchase it myself on Amazon to check the credits. @IJBall: Interestingly enough, looking at The Futon Critic's ratings, not only is Lab Rats only listed for February 27, 2012, as seen here, it's only listed once. As for February 28, 2012, there is nothing as seen here. That further supports the original airing being double-length and the parted titles being reruns. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Geraldo's right about the "one credits" vs. "two credits" issue, though. I have no idea how to check on that, as the "streaming version" may not be in the form it was originally aired in back on Feb. 27, 2011... However, based on the U.S.C.O., I'm inclined to think the pilot and ""Bionic Showdown" were originally aired as a "single" one-hour episode... I'll probably post to the Talk page about this (when I have time), as suggested... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:51, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez: Taking care of the numbering and inbound links would not be a problem for me. Thankfully, this isn't like the whole iCarly fiasco. @MPFitz1968 and Nyuszika7H: Do either of you have access to this episode in one-hour form? If not, I may purchase it myself on Amazon to check the credits. @IJBall: Interestingly enough, looking at The Futon Critic's ratings, not only is Lab Rats only listed for February 27, 2012, as seen here, it's only listed once. As for February 28, 2012, there is nothing as seen here. That further supports the original airing being double-length and the parted titles being reruns. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Following up on Talk:List of Lab Rats episodes#Production codes – finding this in the U.S.C.O. database is tricky: you have to search under both "Lab Rats" and "Disney Lab Rats" to find all the episodes. But U.S.C.O. seems to further confirm: the pilot (and "Bionic Showdown") should be combined (i.e. Parts 1 & 2 "counted" as "one episode"), but "The Vanishing" is two... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
I'm thinking this and this are IP vandalism, but I recall you having access to the entire BMW series, and just wanted to make sure that these credits added are false. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- @MPFitz1968: I will check when I'm back home. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
OK, some more disruption at the article, with another edit by the same IPv6/64 - upon looking at that edit, it was made to the episode "Angela's Men", which I then reverted as false credit/vandalism. I didn't mention episodes for the other two edits I cited earlier in the month, but if you need those, Amaury, please let me know. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- @MPFitz1968: Sorry for not following through. I'm going to try to start going through the episodes this week for verification. Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
I made no unconstructive or disruptive edits, i was referring to the sources. Trying to threaten and block me was unnecessary you twat. Stuv3 (talk) 13:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
According to Deadline: [1] --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- However, Alex, Inc. has been cancelled: [2] --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
You know, this edit points in the direction that this one needs a dedicated 'Production' section. Just sayin... 
--IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:36, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: It's in the works at User:Amaury/sandbox/Splitting Up Together. I'm waiting to get caught up on all the episodes so I can do everything at once. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Honestly, you'll get less resistance from other editors if you do these kinds of things "piecemeal" rather than "all at once". IOW, if it's ready, I'd spin the 'Production' section out now, and do your other changes later, in a series of edits. Just a suggestion... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:32, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Done. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall:
- Honestly, you'll get less resistance from other editors if you do these kinds of things "piecemeal" rather than "all at once". IOW, if it's ready, I'd spin the 'Production' section out now, and do your other changes later, in a series of edits. Just a suggestion... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:32, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Fast Layne
According to this [3] (not sure how good a WP:RS this is, but there's no reason to doubt it either...), Fast Layne has already wrapped filming. It's maybe borderline under WP:TVSHOW, as there's no actual specific premiere date yet... But this news, along with the already reported "2018" premiere date, are probably enough to justify moving the draft into mainspace... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:37, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Also, according to your THR source –
"The sitcom, targeted at kids ages six to 14 and their families, has gone into production for a fall premiere."
– Coop and Cami Ask the World looks to be in the same boat, and can probably also be moved to mainspace. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC)- To follow up, in the case of both of those these, I'd probably like to see at least one more independent WP:RS source in the article – adding the {{Draft article}} template to drafts is useful for this sort of thing. But, if we can find that, I think both of these can be moved into Mainspace now. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:56, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
What did I miss here? Why were those edits from the IP deleted? Do you know?... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:18, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Looks like I missed it, too. IronGargoyle could answer the question for us, though. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:20, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Severe violations of WP:BLP (per the log). I will leave my description there, as describing the content of the edits defeats the point of deleting them. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Looks like it involved Ella Anderson, at several articles, and an IP-hopper. And, yeah, with that, I don't need to know the details... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:42, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Where do IPs get off thinking it's cool to try to besmirch people like this? Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- It looks like this was even worse that that. And let's just leave it at that... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:18, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Where do IPs get off thinking it's cool to try to besmirch people like this? Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Looks like it involved Ella Anderson, at several articles, and an IP-hopper. And, yeah, with that, I don't need to know the details... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:42, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Severe violations of WP:BLP (per the log). I will leave my description there, as describing the content of the edits defeats the point of deleting them. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Wasn't aware of this [4]. Thanks. Meters (talk) 02:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Meters: You're welcome. Yeah, it has to be D M Y—in other words, Wikipedia's default format—for it to display properly in users' local time or format; otherwise, it'll just show as, for example,
Preceding unsigned comment added by Zefr (talk • contribs) 01:53, May 24, 2018 (UTC)
instead ofPreceding unsigned comment added by Zefr (talk • contribs) Today, 6:53 pm (UTC−7)
. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:47, 24 May 2018 (UTC)- Strange. i though unsourced2 was specifically written to allow for cut and pastes from the history. Live and learn... Meters (talk) 02:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
[5] "leaf blower" is a common word, but a relevant gadget in the real world which serves here to produce a pronounced comical effect through incongruence with the described action ... Ah, well, you know, forget it. I would love to see the entire article and its kin being shredded and done with anyway. -- Kku (talk) 14:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
While I watched the one-hour finale, I didn't really watch the two episodes aired before it. Regarding this edit, did you watch "The Thundredth"? Was Paris Berelc actually a guest in it?... TIA. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ditto Brian Stepanek. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Yes and yes. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
One point about this edit – in terms of the show_name_2 parameter, what {{Infobox television}} documentation says is "Also known as", i.e. other names by which the show is known. Separate multiple entries using [Plainlist] or [Unbulleted list].
It actually doesn't say anything about foreign markets. FWIW. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I think it's one of those common sense type of things. See User talk:Amaury/2016#Liv and Maddie, where this was raised once before. You even commented on that discussion, albeit it was semi-off-topic. Amaury (talk | contribs) 00:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- This one looks to be a little different than that – in the Liv and Maddie-type cases, it was gimmicky rename for a fourth season (which seems to be specific to Disney, and is apparently done for contractual reasons). This, OTOH, seems to be a full-on "official" rename – it appears to be more similar to a case like Valerie (TV series), though it's a little early yet to know for sure. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:36, 1 June 2018 (UTC)