User talk:Amarkov/RfA standards

If I may comment, I think your reduction of the evaluation to a set of strict number standards is counterproductive. Some admins have never fought vandals. Others have rarely edited user talk, preferring to talk at WP:talk or article:talk. Finally, we don't want to encourage recipefication of adminship... - crz crztalk 02:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I made it pretty clear that I never use those things as strict rules. Half of them I don't even bother to check. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 02:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've clarified it. Hopefully size 5 font gets the point through to even people skimming it. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 02:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And here's the difference between your criteria and mine: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Davidruben. (Besides, what exactly did you mean by "why aren't you already an admin"?) - crz crztalk 04:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that I thought he should have gone through RfA a long time ago. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 05:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]