User talk:Amansaggu26

Welcome!

Hello, Amansaggu26, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 16:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OmiseGO (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OmiseGO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Amansaggu26, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 00:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OmiseGO (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Formatting errors in references need to be fixed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OmiseGO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tether (cryptocurrency) (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Galobtter was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Tether (cryptocurrency) instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

That article was actually created later, and does look a quite a bit worse; you can merge it in.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tether (cryptocurrency) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:BX Thailand (Cryptocurrency Exhange) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:BX Thailand (Cryptocurrency Exhange), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tether (cryptocurrency) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tether (cryptocurrency), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of OmiseGO for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OmiseGO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmiseGO until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Џ 21:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amansaggu26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 49.228.96.144.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as your account is not directly blocked therefore I can't unblock. But yes, the IP is still blocked and going to be for a while. So I recommend that you go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to request IP block exemption. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I appear to have been blocked from editing. Please can you unblock this? Amansaggu26 (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GS

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jtbobwaysf (talk) 11:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whale Alert (company) (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whale Alert (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 00:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Followup from -en-help

See WP:FORBESCON for a bit more information. Basically, any "contributor" piece that wasn't published in Forbes' print version (and thus subjected to its editorial practises) or written by a known expert speaking about their field of experties is considered to be little more than an opinion piece.

(Note that the IRC network views posting large numbers of links in a short time frame as spam, which is why you got automatically killed from the network.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 17:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply :-) I am unsure if they are "known experts speaking about their field of expertise". Is this just a judgement call? or do you have any suggestions on how to define this? Amansaggu26 (talk) 18:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking, they should be known at the very least both nationally (if not internationally) and outside their field's community. The sort of person a layman would be able to identify by name and acknowledge as an expert in their field. Think someone like Neil DeGrasse Tyson. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 18:15, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see. Ok cool. Thanks for your help :-) Amansaggu26 (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 18:24, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I opened a AFC page or something to ask the question before I saw your reply. I am not sure how to get back to it. This AFC question/page can be closed. Cheers again! Amansaggu26 (talk) 18:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whale Alert (company) (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whale Alert (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 07:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Whale Alert (company)

Hello, Amansaggu26. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whale Alert (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Whale Alert (company)

Hello, Amansaggu26. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Whale Alert".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]