User talk:Amangpaintor

February 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Elito Circa— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 11:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Elito Circa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 11:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:ArtCulture, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 11:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page.

Kuru (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amangpaintor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that I did something wrong and that it won't happen again
*what I was blocked for is not my normal behavior
*I take my block as a chance for me to become more acquainted with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines so that I can become a well-respected user. I will focus specifically on the policy that I am against so that I don't make the same mistake again

Decline reason:

Request does not address your abuse of multiple accounts, your chosen username is clearly a deliberate attempt at impersonation, and a quick "sorry" is nowhere near enough after your blatant acts of vandalism. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.