User talk:Amandyke

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amandyke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I called out User:I Use Dial due to the talk page conversation on NinjaRobotPirate where I was called to be banned by User:Springee. In there User:NinjaRobotPirate stated that be banned me off the cuff with the comment: "I was feeling rather irritable when I did that, but I think maybe it's still the best way to deal with this." I mentioned the user as in the guide to request an unban and reasons for a ban for off-site canvassing it specifically called out speaking to those points. Which I thought I did. I thought I had touched on the points required, please let me know what else I need to respond to, discuss, etc to get this unwarranted and hasty ban lifted.

Decline reason:

This appeal has been unsuccessful in convincing any administrator to unblock the account. I'd consider an unblock if you provide credible examples for productive contributions you would like to make in the future, and if you explicitly agree, as a binding unblock condition, to a topic ban from Tim Pool, broadly construed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amandyke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I think this entire experience of seeing how an admin can have a bad day, request a ban for a user based on no actual evidence (despite the requirements put forward in the off-site canvassing page) and then have that ban upheld based on the evidences of two users having edited pages that have to do with Cars or Motorcycles and then having to do broadly with conservative leaning pages, has completely soured me to contributing or being much in anyway involved with Wikipedia. This has been unilaterally aggravating and an abortion of justice on its' face. I will not agree to a topic ban on principle. I made a single edit to the Tim Pool page, defended that edit in the Talk page and for that I have been banned indefinitely as a Meat Puppet. This reeks of injustice and cronyism. Despite having this account since 2007, I can be completely cut off from the entire purpose of Wikipedia (aggregated knowledge consolidation from infinite sources) because some minority of users disagree with a single non-vandalizing edit.Amandyke (talk) 20:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

An account that doesn't edit for 5 years all of a sudden edits in some of the most contentious sections in Wikipedia after showing exactly zero interest in these articles in the past? That is a giant red flag. Also, since you do not want to discuss your block, I am removing talk page access. RickinBaltimore (talk) 00:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.