User talk:Amandalee18
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Amandalee18, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review Suggestions
[edit]Hi, I'm not sure which page I am supposed to post your suggestions so post them on your talk page and your article. If you have any questions or anything don't hesitate to message me back on my talk page. Here are my suggestions: Citation Issues
I checked the first references for several links that came up with an error code; however, I found links online that will work: Citation #1 http://www.okbar.org/members/BarJournal/archive2005/Aprarchive05/obj7612fal.aspx
Citation #5. When you click on the highlighted blue title of the pdf it brings you to a page not found. This is the link to the pdf that I found online http://www.pen.org/sites/default/files/Secret%20Sources%20report.pdf The link above is also cited in citation #6 and does not work correctly.
Citation #13 https://www.privacyrights.org/content/wiretapping-and-eavesdropping-telephone-calls
Citation #19 http://www.tmcec.com/resources/more-resources/ticket_fixing/
Citation #20 http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1158&context=californialawreview
Citation #22 http://legalnewsline.com/stories/510527300-group-urges-osha-to-protect-union-whistleblowers
Copy Editing Issues and Other Suggestions Under “Civil Service Reform Act of 1978” change the word “purse” to “pursue.”
Under “False Claims Act” change the word “materiel” to “material.”
I believe that the first section titled Law could be removed and the short sentence that explains there is Public Law and Common Law could be added to the introduction of the article to start it off.
Under “Criminal Law” there is a link that says “Please clarify” I would recommend specifying that the “safety data sheet” is the data sheet of the product that contained the hazardous medical evaluation of an illness after being exposed to a hazardous substance the safety data sheet of the substance and verification of worker’s compensation is required.”
Under “Us Labor Law and Policy” is a contradictory sentence that needs clarification. It says that the manager cannot order people to do something if it’s unethical etc but they can do so until there is a dispute. Very confusing but I’m sure you are already aware of this issue.
Reading under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 the first sentence is very heavily advising. Perhaps changing “must” to “may” might help. Or is the employee actually required to seek defense? That could be something to look into.
Under the Whistleblower Protection Act this statement seemed very opinionated to me “While not necessarily protected by the Whistleblower Protection Act, private employers should be prohibited from firing workers after the worker has disclosed criminal activity to organizations like OSHA, EPA, SEC, FBI, or other similar organizations (False Claims Act).” I would look into that statement and consider restructuring this sentence. This whole section could be revised to sound less instructional.
Another thing to consider would be to go through all the acts and laws and sort together all the laws that are targeted at what the managers can and cannot do when dealing with whistleblowers and the laws and acts that are aimed at what protects whistleblowers specifically. The laws seem to be thrown into the article with no organization and this could be a way to organize them.
--AshleyFortierUML (talk) 20:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Peer to Peer UMASS Lowell James ONeil (nailsONeil) to Amandalee18
[edit]Peer To Peer- From James ONeil (NailsONeil) UML to Amanda (Amandalee18) Wikipedia Article “Whistleblower Protection in the United States” Hello Amandalee, this is James aka NailsONeil UMASS Lowelland I would like to do a Peetr Review on the work you have done so far on ‘WhistleBlower Protection In the United States’ from Wikipedia. I can see your lead sections using the subheader1 is in line with what the Wikipedia training has recommended so I find it very easy to navigate the article and find the different acts the government has created to protect working people. I was wondering if there would be a place in your article to add the internal work that an EHS department (Environment Health Safety) may provide for a company. Grievances and Exceptions usually start right at the source in many large companies today. Of course as I read your discourse some companies may use pernicious means to avoid responsibility. I think because of your work the article has become more balanced and your mission statement from the very beginning I read on your ‘TALK’ was to make the article more informational and less instructional. I think you have accomplished much of that. I see Heidi (our other UML peer)has pinpointed a few links that were suspect and I agree with that. Overall the strengths outweigh any weaknesses. We still have several weeks. As Peer to Peer I give you an A. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NailsONeil (talk • contribs) 21:23, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:False claims act.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:False claims act.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly hi! 12:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:False claims act picture.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:False claims act picture.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Whistleblower definition.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Whistleblower definition.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Apples grow on pines (talk) 01:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Public law image.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Public law image.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Apples grow on pines (talk) 01:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Freedom of information act.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Freedom of information act.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Apples grow on pines (talk) 23:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Ethics in government act.png listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ethics in government act.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
