User talk:Amandajm/Archives/2014/May

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	I like how you kindly corrected Lambocar. That's the RIGHT way of doing things. VladDroid256 (talk) 02:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:ChristmasTreeLights.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:36, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Editathon Tribute

Hi Amandajm,

We are having an editathon at the State Library of New South Wales on 10 May as part of a global tribute to User:Wadewitz. We are going to work on articles that were Adrianne's special interest, namely women and women writers.

Information and place to sign up is at Sydney Tribute Editathon. Please come if you can. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 03:44, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Renaissance people, engineers etc

There are some categories of Renaissance people by occupation (artists and writers), but why not add the categories and appropriate names to List of Renaissance figures eg separate out architects from artists; add sections for engineers, and for scientists (which seems to have disappeared, as Galileo Galilei was in it). The Middle Ages is categoriesed as from the 5th to 15th centuries inclusive; and I aimed for engineers by period to have Ancient engineers, Medieval engineers and 16th to 19th century engineers ie a complete range. The Renaissance seems to be categorised over several centuries, 14th to 17th centuries. Hugo999 (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leon Battista Alberti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Renaissance Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Domenico Ghirlandaio‎;

This is one pic that does not look good in gallery

Please don't do me the same thing you did with Michelangelo - removing everything I did because you feel you know better. Girladaio needs a gallery, and the pictures I chosen are good. Please don't leave that article without a gallery. Galleries are not discuraged. Images in the gallery collectively do have encyclopedic value and add to the reader's understanding of the subject. Galleries are not discuraged. Please see also this discussion here, Talk:Charles Marion Russell. Hafspajen (talk) 13:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

As about the pictures, I used the ones I found on commons, right? And I used the ones that were visible and were visible in a gallery. I hate people puting pictures in a gallery when you can't se a thing , enormous frescos and giant paintings and such. And also before I did anything with that article there were 3 pictures in it, and nothing else. One can't show an artist work by chosing 3 pictures only, that won't do. Also many of those pictures are rather good, you can place them in a different way, yes but don't remove it all of them. Hafspajen (talk) 13:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

• 
  Lovely detail
• 
  A v ery good portrait - St Jerome in his Study (detail), 1480
• 
  Portrait of a Lady, 1490
• 
  Picture of a young girl
• 
  Look at the expressions, it is wonderful.
• 
  Very good picture, ever if not known.
• 
  And this one it is his brother and pupil.

And I have chosen those because the expressions of the faces. And Did it not striked you that he was a very good portrait painter?

One is entitled to have oppinions. You have quite a lot of them and don't hold them back a second. I studied in Art school - art and some art history, for four years. I have an exam in landscape architecture and currently I am studying teology and work as a landscape architect. And just because you like one picture it doesn't mean I have to like it. And I would appreciate if you would try to use some of the WP:Good faith recommended (Wikipedia pillar Nr 5) , and try too look at the peoples good intentions and what is the good in them not only see the bad things about them, their mistakes and silly things. No need to explode over every little thing that others may do wrong. Hafspajen (talk) 15:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

talk, please do not refer to me as "exploding". It told you, as politely as I could, that galleries which are created without clear objectives get rapidly deleted. That is simply what happens. I haven't "exploded". What I have been inclined to do was a great deal of extra work on the said article, and have left myself a whole lot of "fact" tags so that now I will have to do the references.

This is not a matter of liking one picture better than another. It is a case of putting things together in the context of an article. Why are you ignoring my suggestion that you now add some of your favourite details to the gallery? Amandajm (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

• Well, I am doing my best to fight against the gallery deleters. Some day Wikipedia will be a place where galleries are tolerated. And actually galleries were discuraged once upon a time like 2006, but they are not that any more. Architecture of cathedrals and great churches, for example has quite a lot of them and they are still there and add greatly to that article. Haven't noticed your my suggestion, thanks, in that case I will. Hafspajen (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

So, done. Fountain is one of those articles that is a really a striking example for bad gallery use. But otherwise, for what is worth - I think Domenico Ghirlandaio is a much better article now as it was like for 10 days ago... People tend to forget about him, he is kind of in the shadow of Michelangelo, but he is not bad at all, really. Hafspajen (talk) 18:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gentile de' Becchi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ferdinand of Aragon and Francesco Salviati

Lorenzo de' Medici (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Giovanni de' Medici

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Gentile de' Becchi at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 21:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Jurakio appreciates your thanks for the Gothic Architecture!

	Thanks for your appreciation!
	You can find me here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jurakio Jurakio (talk) 05:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Gentile de' Becchi

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Gentile de' Becchi

 Done GiantSnowman 12:19, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

!

See you working with Fountain...And if there is any editor who can fix that hopless aritcle , it is probably you... Hafspajen (talk) 11:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

• Well, somebody tried to put in all ever existing fountain in that article... No Putting together galleries that look good, serve a purpose and are not going to get deleted takes a lot of work. Jamming together every picture that appeals to you, is not a good way to go. You need to choose high quality images that sit well together. Then you need to arrange them as if you were hanging works in a real gallery.... A solitaire game, is that something you win? Hafspajen (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

I mean that that article has great potential. But as it is: Jamming together every picture found on commons, it is not that great. Half of the galleries probably don't add at all to the article. I think, (that's me9 that cosing 1 or 2 picture for every section is quite enough, thumb size single picture. And then it could de one or two real good galleries. Hafspajen (talk) 13:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Spring Hall, Halifax

Please see note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 23:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Vital articles/Expanded/Arts

I have reverted your edit to this page because no consensus had been reached for those adds at Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Expanded. Per the guidelines for the project, new adds or drops must be discussed there, and five people must support them before they can be made pbp 04:48, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Parish church of Urtijëi

Hallo, I appreciate how nicely you formatted the article, thanks Moroder

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For you. Hafspajen (talk) 16:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

You are a great editor. I am just envious... Hafspajen (talk) 02:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Well done, your defence at DYK talk is admirable and I note that it is you who is improving the article and the wiki and defending your actions that in total improve the encyclopedia. I have no doubts about your intentions. Hopefully others will assist in spotting improvements and fixing them without the drama. Well done. Victuallers (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: Wells Cathedral

This is a note to let the main editors of Wells Cathedral know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on June 7, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at present, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 7, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Wells Cathedral is a Church of England place of worship in Wells, Somerset, dedicated to St Andrew the Apostle, and is the seat of the Bishop of Bath and Wells. The present building dates from 1175 to 1490, an earlier church having been built on the site in 705. With its broad west front and large central tower, it is the city's dominant feature and a landmark in the Somerset countryside. Its architecture presents a harmonious whole which is entirely Gothic and mostly in a single style, the Early English Gothic of the late 12th and early 13th centuries. In this Wells differs from most other English medieval cathedrals, which have parts in the earlier Romanesque style. The historian John Harvey considers it to be the first truly Gothic structure in Europe. Wells has an exceptional number of surviving secular buildings associated with its chapter of secular canons, such as the Bishop's Palace and the Vicars' Close, a residential street which has remained intact from the 15th century. The cathedral is a scheduled monument and is designated by English Heritage as a Grade I listed building. The eastern end retains much ancient stained glass, which is rare in England. (Full article...)

You (and your talk-page stalkers) may also be interested to hear that there have been some changes at the TFA requests page recently. Nominators no longer need to calculate how many "points" an article has, the instructions have been simplified, and there's a new nomination system using templates based on those used for DYK suggestions. Please consider nominating another article, or commenting on an existing nomination, and leaving some feedback on your experience. Thank you. UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

NB 7th June not 6th on someones blog.— Rod ^talk 06:58, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gentile de' Becchi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bishop's palace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 24 May 2014 (UTC)