User talk:Amandajm/Archives/2013/November

Sant'Alessandro capital in Romanesque Architecture

Hello Amandajm, I am gpcarrai (Giampaolo Carrai,Italy). The photo of Sant'Alessandro capital that you have cancelled ist an interesting example of survival/revival of roman tradition in Italy during romanesque age (an other famous example of italian medieval classicism ist the baptistery in Florence). I think that in a complete article, for a complete vision of romanesque architecture, these exceptions are useful and clarifier. Romanesque architecture is extremely various. The quality of the photo is not too good, because the church is closed (2002!) and I used an old photo of my collection, but is neat. You can find more informations and images about Sant'Alessandro church, with bibliography, in italian wikipedia: Chiesa di Sant'Alessandro (Lucca). I hope that this interesting photo will be again in the article of wikipedia about romanesque architecture. ciao

   Giampaolo Carrai gpcarrai Gpcarrai (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Romanesque secular and domestic architecture

Thank you for your remarks.

It was out of my mind to imagine that in Wiki Manual of Style (please note the capital letters) it is, should I say, prescribed to use for any title, the sentence-style capitalization instead of the title-style capitalization. Now that I was graciously informed by you of such weirdness (and of my ignorance), I'll conform. Who am I to go against the MoS rules?

To go to the gallery question, what do you mean with “In most articles about paintings, this is not the case, and the changes to packed galleries doesn't work effectively.” I can't see paintings in the Romanesque secular and domestic architecture pages, and what exactly do you mean when you say that packed galleries don't work effectively? I used galleries in the first place for the reason that the preceding formatting didn't work well (on my monitor, that is). But nowadays there are so many monitor resolutions, and sizes, and zoom factors, that it's really awkward to find a generally good way to show pictures or any other thing that is visually affected by the combination of monitor dimension / resolution / magnification factor.

Anyway, the confusion originated by your communication even escalated by noticing that in the Romanesque architecture pages, which you made so extensive contributions to, almost all pictures are formatted in packed galleries. And now that you reverted the reversion of my contribution, I am even more confused. Please, illuminate me.Carlotm (talk) 09:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parthenon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metope (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Jesenite

Can you tell me what this word means? Yours curiously, Bashereyre (talk) 09:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Leon Battista Alberti may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• life. He loved animals and had a pet dog, a mongrel, for whom he wrote a [[panegyric]], ''Canis'').<ref name="Renaissance Italy 1860"/> Vasari describes him as "an admirable citizen, a man of
• *[http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL.HOUGH:1267672 MS Typ 422.2. Alberti, Leon Battista, 1404–1472. Ex

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for William Carr Smith

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

st james

I have been looking into the article. I already made some changes although more work on references are needed imho. Here are some first remarks:

• the article cries for a good picture
• the article reads on one hand "constructed between 1819 and 1824" and on the other hand "It was constructed between 1820 and 1824".
• I would add an infobox but I would not impose it

Hope this helps Alberto Fernández Fernández (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Culture of the Sea

Hallo, I'd be really pleased if we could work out any needed changes to Sea quietly, here or at Sea in culture, where we won't be threatening to upset an exceptionally hard-won consensus. Sea is a long and carefully-constructed FA, and we were forced to cut down the culture section, so adding to it might be a good thing. I do hope you see where I'm coming from on this. The result is that we have the subsidiary article, Sea in culture, which can perfectly accommodate additional material - indeed, we could work it up to GA if you felt so inclined.

I'd like to suggest, therefore, that you freely make all the changes you have suggested, but to Sea in culture, and then we consider very slowly what to tweak back in Sea. That way, we can assess the balance of materials in a broader cultural context than will ever be possible in Sea, which is quite rightly in 'summary style', skimming quickly over a mass of material. For what it's worth, I'd love to see some Masefield and Kipling in there too, but we have to remember that we are under the cosh to be global, however glorious the maritime past might have been.

Finally, could you please reply here, rather than anywhere else - I shall watch; feel free to ping me if I miss something. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

OK! I'm flapping around being blunt and Bogan, as usual. I have been told about it. I should listen! Do you want me too delete my comments or would that be going too far? Amandajm (talk) 09:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Not sure of protocol here. Maybe move them to Sea in culture, if that's allowed. Anyway, let's continue here or on that page. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Glass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Transparency

Leon Battista Alberti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vatican

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Invitation

There is a backstage pass coming up to be followed by an editathon in the State Library of New South Wales on 23 November. This is the first time that an Australian cultural institution has opened its doors to us in this way and will be a special opportunity because the Library is providing: one of its best rooms; its expert curators (along with their expertise and their white gloves); a newly launched website (containing new resources); and of course, items from its collection (including rare and usually unavailable material) which we can look at, learn from, and use, to improve WP articles. For example, on the chosen topic (Australia and WWI), the Library holds many diaries and manuscripts from the period.

As you can see from the Library's project page, they have connected this editathon with their own work. They have already set out a wide range of resources to make things easier for us. Please sign up on the editathon project page if you can participate either online or in person with other Wikipedians. Hope to see you there! (Sorry if you've received this message before - I did a quick check but didn't see it.) 99of9 (talk) 10:07, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Likely

not in informal American usage, but we should change it. Sorry, I didn't see the "in use" on Jesse. I see St James Church, Sydney is progressing well! Johnbod (talk) 18:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)