User talk:Jaat24

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of programmes broadcast by Pogo have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of programmes broadcast by Pogo was changed by Aman9211420 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953574 on 2021-08-08T12:32:17+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:32, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Cartoon Network (Pakistani TV channel). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ----Rdp060707|talk 08:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Aman9211420! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Shakuni, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 13:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

No, you may not remove reports by other editors concerning you at Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents. General Ization ^Talk 04:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What i did wrong that user do not know that anime is also an animation he dividing it in anime and animation his edits are poor Jaat24 (talk) 04:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter. You may not remove reports by other editors concerning you at Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents. General Ization ^Talk 04:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jaat24! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of List of programmes broadcast by Pogo several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:List of programmes broadcast by Pogo, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 07:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jk deenu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 10:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cartoon Network (Indian TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DEN. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of programmes broadcast by Cartoon Network Hindi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of programmes broadcast by Cartoon Network Hindi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 07:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Amanheheh337 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amanheheh337. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #58983

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see UTRS appeal #59003 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

reviewing admin--Deepfriedokra

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaat24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir this time I am sorry from whole heart. I was blocked beacause i was making bad edits and reverting edits of other users by using my multiple account Amanheheh337. I was reverting edits by my two accounts and doing personal attacks that is why I got block. That block is no longer necessary because I understand what I blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. I need to unblock beacuase I created many artilces and I want to contribute more. Now I will do good contribution. I feel sorry to wikipedia and all users. I should be unblocked because everyone should be given 1 chance. As they say sorry is magical word. I expect the magic to happen. I am also human i also did mistake. But now I am sorry for that. I should be unblocked because block is not punishment it is to stop me from making bad edits. Now i understand and promise to make good edits. I promised to you sir and I always true to my promise. NOW I WILL NOT USE MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS. Hope sir you will forgive me and give me a chance . I would also try my best to not make any disruptive edits and i would think before making edits to make sure the edit is generally good, productive, not disruptive and not an edit that would waste any other editor’s time. I will do this by going over it and thinking about the purpose of each edit. The constructive edits i would make include going to random articles and linking key words or any important words, fixing any general mistakes such as punctuation mistakes or spelling mistakes, reverting vandalism, and also edits such as adding paragraphs to articles if i find any new info on that article that comes from a reliable sourceJaat24 (talk) 10:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

~~typing my full comment --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC~~ It's rare that I express outrage while declining an unblock request. I do so now. Sock puppetry in and of itself destroys the Community's trust in the first place. We can add to that the user's expectation of obtaining unblocking at UTRS by saying "sorry." This is not a kindergarten, and sometimes "sorry" is not even the beginning of what a user needs to regain the Community's trust or to be unblocked. We can further add the cynical and faithless promise made in this unblock request, "NOW I WILL NOT USE MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS. " An hour after writing that, user starts using another sock puppet!. Obviously, "sorry" for this user is merely a manipulative tool to gain what they want. When that fails, they revert back to deceit. Blocks are non punitive and are done to prevent disruption, and it is impossible to say that this user has come close to addressing the reasons for their block and producing a reasonable belief that they would no longer disrupt Wikipedia. Contrarily, they have proven the need to maintain this block. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)< )[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Deepfriedokra: I don't know if you were already working on this, but I ran some additional checks. Less than an hour after the above request was posted, they renamed one of their existing, but previously undiscovered, socks. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amanheheh337#04 June 2022 -- RoySmith (talk) 15:16, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Though I declined the UTRS, I think any reasonable admin would decline this based on the obvious attempt at subterfuge. That unblock request being still open, they simply switched to another account. Thanks, @RoySmith: for your help. For the record, I stand opposed to any future unblock. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra:

Sir please trust me. If will use multiple accounts this time then next time another user will block me. I respect you sir. But to gain community trust it's not up to the mark. But please sir kindly have some time to understand me and please try to trust me. A chance can change life but one should a give chance and it's my last chance. This I will not use any multiple accounts. Respected sir I beg you sorry sir. Kindly sir please give me a chance. I am new at Wikipedia and previously I was not aware of rules now I read all rules Jaat24 (talk) 13:07, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Frowns) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amanheheh337 shows you've already had many "chances" and used many sock puppets. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:14, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If sir you think that after unblock I will create another account then you are sir thinking worng. If sir I have to create another then I have already created then why I am asking for unblock. Please think on this sir. I promise in the name of my country India that I will not use any multiple accounts Sir you are saying An hour after writing that, user starts using another sock puppet!. Then please give me a chance if will create an account then please immediately block me.

 Jaat24 (talk) 13:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only Amanheheh337 is mine rest of them of are not mine you can check by ip Jaat24 (talk) 08:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As the CU who investigated this case, I'll say that there's "confirmed" and then there's "confirmed in multiple ways, beyond any shadow of a doubt". This case is the later. "Only Amanheheh337 is mine" is patently untrue. I'm going to revoke talk page access. Go annoy the UTRS people if you must. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith: Courtesy ping UTRS appeal #70726 is open. FWIW, I am incredibly gullible. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]