User talk:Alyx Bradford
Welcome!
[edit]- Hi, Alyx Bradford, Welcome to Wikipedia!
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Wikipedia:Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and The FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page.
Additional Tips:
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
Matani2005 Talk05:57, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Small articles
[edit]Hello. Please consider refraining from creating several small articles at a time. It's confusing to readers. Will all these thirteen houses, for example, likely grow to be good articles? -- Perfecto 02:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, in fact. I intend to expand upon them as soon as I've double-checked all of my information. Some will have less information than others, but as the fourth book in the series will be out in a few months, there's no telling how much more information may be learned then about any or all of the Houses.
Alyx Bradford 02:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Alright then. I look forward to it. Thank you! -- Perfecto 02:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Good luck with the Kushiel's Legacy articles; good work so far!
I'm a big fan of this series, and yet... it is not quite as important to literary history as, say, the Lord of the Rings trilogy. There are a LOT of articles, as was pointed out above, and your answer was hang on, they were going to get expanded. Several months have went by and the articles are still mostly stubs. I had suggested a while back that some of the articles be merged, for example, the 12 houses could be merged into one article, the several noble houses could be merged, and all the characters except the top 6 or so into minor characters and so forth. I'd be willing to do some of the work. You can reply here. ++Lar: t/c 17:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Just because it's not as large a fandom doesn't mean there isn't a demand for the information -- and I am going to get to expanding everything to include all the information I consider pertinent. It just takes a long time to go through each book. I think you can see that, in the few months that have passed, I've made quite a lot of progress. I suppose I just don't see why there's such a pressing need to condense everything. I may well need or want to condense things in the future, but I'd far rather wait until I've actually gotten everything up, and then see what articles can be merged together, rather than doing it now, when I've still got three books to get through (one of which only came out last week and I haven't even read yet), and then have to undo it later when I've new information to add. If you've read this series, you know how very many characters there are; there is a minor characters page, where I'm putting all the ones that really aren't of consequence, but I think to add in all the ones but the top six or so would make that article itself ridiculously large -- probably well beyond the maximum character limit. And cutting out all that information would, I think, be a mistake. I aim to make these articles as comprehensive as the ones for larger fandoms are; just because there are fewer people seeking this information doesn't mean they should get any less. Alyx Bradford 20:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Edit summary
[edit]
--Starionwolf 17:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Notability of Phèdre's Boys
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Phèdre's Boys, by Addd wiki (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Phèdre's Boys seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Phèdre's Boys, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Allies of Camlach for deletion
[edit]
A discussion has begun about whether the article Allies of Camlach, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allies of Camlach until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Allthing, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allthing until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Isabel L'Envers for deletion
[edit]A discussion has begun about whether the article Isabel L'Envers, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabel L'Envers until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:20, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of House L'Envers for deletion
[edit]A discussion has begun about whether the article House L'Envers, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House L'Envers until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Barquiel L'Envers for deletion
[edit]A discussion has begun about whether the article Barquiel L'Envers, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barquiel L'Envers until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Battle of the Three Princes for deletion
[edit]A discussion has begun about whether the article Battle of the Three Princes, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Three Princes until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Bitterest Winter for deletion
[edit]A discussion has begun about whether the article Bitterest Winter, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitterest Winter until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:40, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Rahab (Kushiel's Legacy) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion has begun about whether the article Rahab (Kushiel's Legacy), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahab (Kushiel's Legacy) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 07:22, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Thelesis de Mornay for deletion
[edit]The article Thelesis de Mornay is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thelesis de Mornay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Court of Night-Blooming Flowers for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Court of Night-Blooming Flowers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Court of Night-Blooming Flowers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Cassiline Brotherhood for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cassiline Brotherhood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassiline Brotherhood until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:25, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yeshuites is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeshuites until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tsingani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsingani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Stregazza family for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stregazza family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stregazza family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:31, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Alba and Eire (Kushiel's Legacy) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alba and Eire (Kushiel's Legacy) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alba and Eire (Kushiel's Legacy) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Places in Kushiel's Legacy for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Places in Kushiel's Legacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Places in Kushiel's Legacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:33, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of House Shahrizai for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article House Shahrizai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House Shahrizai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:33, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of House Somerville for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article House Somerville is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House Somerville until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:34, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of House Trevalion for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article House Trevalion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House Trevalion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:34, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Isidore d'Aiglemort for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isidore d'Aiglemort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isidore d'Aiglemort until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:35, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Master of the Straits for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Master of the Straits is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master of the Straits until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:35, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Minor Characters in Kushiel's Legacy for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minor Characters in Kushiel's Legacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minor Characters in Kushiel's Legacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 08:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)