User talk:AlverichA

May 2019

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chicano have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican descent

Isn't it true that Chicano applies only to people whom parents are Mexican descent?AlverichA (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's already encapsulated in the first sentence of the article--"a chosen identity of some Mexican Americans in the United States". Also, please copyedit your contributions before you hit save. Thank you. 209.51.172.142 (talk) 16:39, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Native Americans in the United States. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:50, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Number of continents

Different cultures have different definitions. Most of the world has 7, but Latin Americans and a few other countries count North and South America as one. As this is the English language Wikipedia, we say there are seven. Please stop these edits, besides being a violation of NPOV they are breaking links to other articles. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 07:53, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AlverichA, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AlverichA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop bothering me about the name America, ask at the tea house.

I've tried to explain above but you've ignored me. Doug Weller talk 16:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Aboideau. I noticed that you recently removed content from Latino without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. aboideau^talk 20:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC) Latino is not an English word the term Latin is not only related to Latin American countries but also to those countries whose main language derives from the Romance language for Example France, Italy, Portugal, etc. If you are speaking in English you can not use the word Latino, that's an Spanish word that means male Latin in English.--AlverichA (talk) 15:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We most certainly can use Latino in English. English has no language police. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 16:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC) According to you the term Latino and Latin have the same meaning?----[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:10, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Latinx, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MarnetteD|Talk 16:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

America questions

You've had a number of answers. If you keep up with this you will probably be blocked, so please find something else to do. Doug Weller talk 14:37, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah! Regionalist answers that satisfies the natives of USA. USA is not AMERICA, USA is part of America, but you will disagree with that --AlverichA (talk) 15:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's common usage that disagrees with you. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 16:00, 4 May 2019 (UTC).[reply]

It was named AMERICA not The Americas in honor of Amerigo Vespucci. AMERICA the continent, USA the country don't get confused. ----

You do understand that English language usage is allowed to differ from Spanish language usage, right? In English language usage there are two continents (North America and South America) and America is the short form name for the United States. This is common usage in all English speaking countries. --Khajidha (talk) 18:22, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Native Americans in the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 16:13, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Americas. Samf4u (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:53, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]