Jump to content

User talk:AlphaKate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, AlphaKate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

August 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lady and the Tramp may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • to let Lady near the baby. When Lady clashes with Aunt Sarah's two trouble-making [siamese cat]]s, Si and Am, she takes Lady to a pet shop to get a muzzle. Lady flees, but is pursued by some

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English Sheepdog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Honor Code (horse) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 21:28, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Derby edit conflict

[edit]

Give me 20 minutes, I'll reconcile your edit conflict and mine. And fix my errors!  ;-) Montanabw(talk) 22:26, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm done, feel free to fix anything I screwed up! Montanabw(talk) 22:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pics

[edit]
default
with upright parameter to make it proportionately bigger
with fixed width

Hey, just an FYI not to do fixed widths on images (i.e. 250px or whatever). The reason for this is threefold: 1) Say nothing and it will default to the standard size; adding a fixed width can sometimes have unexpected results, particularly in infoboxes. 2) People can set different default sizes for images in their browsers, and thus a fixed width will not appear as intended in such cases, 2) Different sizes of screens and different browsers may also render fixed width images in unexpected ways. If the problem is an image looking unusually large or small, you can use the "upright=" parameter to get a similar result, I'll show it with three images here. Montanabw(talk) 04:36, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    • Why do you insist on adding forced widths to the various horse infoboxes after I have explained to you why we don't do this? If you think a photo is badly proportioned, then use the "upright" parameter to shrink it, not a fixed pixel width. You are starting to edit war. Please at least explain your reasoning with an edit summary or on the talk page. Montanabw(talk)

Thanks but no thanks

[edit]

This article had WP:GA status, your set of edits here totally messed it up. You are costing me a lot of time to fix things. Do me a favor and leave well enough alone until you know what you are doing. The next time you want to make major changes to a GA class article, please take it to talk and discuss it first. I have been trying to help you, but you don't seem to be listening very well. So I'm just going to ask you to not dive into articles with a GA or FA icon until you know what you are doing. Fixing typos is fine, removing sources and rearranging an entire article is not. Montanabw(talk) 01:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Montanabw, she's really screwing that article, and obviously refuses to cooperate with the community. Consider leaving a notice at the Administrator's noticeboard if she does not stop.. Flipandflopped (Discuss, Contribs) 01:08, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I know, I got it to GA and I'm trying to clean it up to be back to that status, sit tight, I'll ping you when I'm done. @Flipandflopped:. Montanabw(talk) 01:09, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AlphaKate, another thing you need to stop doing unless you get consensus is removing large amounts of statistical information as you did here. These lists were created by consensus and have been stable for years. Consensus can change, but you need to discuss these things first. I don't actually want to discourage you as a wikipedia editor, but your eiting pattern is making a LOT of cleanup work for eveyrone else, so if you could be a little less "bold" it would be appreciated. Montanabw(talk) 17:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm McDoobAU93. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Brother Bear, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McDoobAU93 20:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holy Roller (horse), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grey/Great Gatsby

[edit]

Thanks for for the correction, it probably won't be the last time I do this. He's Great, he's Grey and FSF would have loved him. I think his rival Golden Horn is more of a Hemingway horse. Tigerboy1966  16:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, AlphaKate. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, AlphaKate. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, AlphaKate. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]