User talk:Alpaniraj
Recent edit to Swadhyay Parivar
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Swadhyay Parivar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Swadhyay Parivar, you may be blocked from editing. Even after requesting you several times to adhere wiki policy of POV, good faith, self promotion and section blanking you keep on adding such content.
Please read a guide to wikipedia that you may not do self-promotion and insert uncited content. You may not remove properly cited Criticism sections too.
Let me know if you need any help. Rakesh.goyal2019 (talk) 04:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Swadhyay Parivar. Roxy the dog. bark 20:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Swadhyay Parivar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Swadhyaya - a silent singing revolution
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Swadhyaya - a silent singing revolution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.facebook.com/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF-%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0-217918258231414/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. {MordeKyle} ☢ 02:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
January 2017
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Swadhyay Parivar. Roxy the dog. bark 13:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Notification of ANI discussion about you
[edit]I have opened a section at WP:ANI about your edits to Swadhyay Parivar. Thanks. Roxy the dog. bark 23:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
January 2017
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)