User talk:Alondrav

Lazaro Arbos

Please do not add the term "stutter problem" to the article again. Multiple editors have replaced it in a way that is encylopedic. We do not describe such conditions as a "problem". Thank you. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Lazaro Arbos, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please be careful never to exaggerate or present content in an out-of context manner. You added the sentence, "Arbos's mother frequently asks him to sing to her, it makes it easier for him and her to communicate." The previously exisitng source that you attached to it does not verify the content. The source merely references a time when the mother said "sing it to me" to him when he was 13 years old. It is very important, especially in a BLP, that all content is very accurate, is not embellished, and does not include any original research or personal interpretations. Thank you. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thursday April 18, 2013

Thank you for your advice, I am sorry for the mistakes I made on the article, I am new to this so I really do not know how this works. But I would like to make some proposal I would like to add "Arbos's mom has frequently asked him to sing to her, because his stutter is strong" i have a reliable source for that, but I forgot to add it onto what I had written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alondrav (talk • contribs) 14:31, 18 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. In terms of the quote you want to add, it's simply not encylopedic (worthy of inclusion). As it stands now, there is already probably too much content regarding his stuttering - an entire paragraph of five sentences - which already is close to violating Wikipedia's due weight policy. It's abundantly clear now that he has a significant stutter and adding anything more about it would be overkill. With BLP articles, it's especially important to be careful about making sure everything is properly sourced and that there is not an improper amount of focus on one particular issue. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So are you trying to say, that there is nothing else I can add to the article ?

Hi there. Can you tell me if you're working with someone else on editing Wikipedia right now? Is this part of some group project? - Alison ^❤ 22:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am working with two other people on editing wikipedia right now. It is part of a project that I am working on at school . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alondrav (talk • contribs)

Hi there. Your above message conflicted with an investigation where we discovered that there are a large number of editors all editing from your location, and quite a few are adding the same sentences into the same article. Can you explain why this is happening? I've blocked all the accounts from editing, including yours, but I'd really like to know what you guys are doing, as it's somewhat against our rules here - Alison ^❤ 01:04, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alondrav (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a student of [redacted] and our class created accounts using school computers which have the same IP adress. Our changes are not malicious. Please unblock Alondrav (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There has been no response for almost a month (✉→BWilkins←✎) 14:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocking - please read

Hi again. Firstly, it's probably best if you don't mention where your group is editing from and I've gone ahead and removed that information, ok? Can you please read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and pass this on to your teacher and to the other students in your group? Also, look at our policy on multiple accounts - it's not okay to have your friends edit the same article as you're editing and have them re-add information that other editors have removed, just because you want it added. That's just not fair to others. If you could request your teacher to carefully read Wikipedia:School and university projects in detail, that would help a lot.

I'm going to point the other accounts to this comment on your page. If you guys and your teacher can read this message and note that you understand it and will go by the rules, I'll be happy to unblock your accounts and you'll be free to edit again :) Deal? - Alison ^❤ 18:32, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you can ask your teacher or another adult to email me at oversight-en-wpwikipedia.org - mark it for my attention - that would be great! There are just some privacy-related things I'd like to quickly go over - Alison ^❤ 18:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]