User talk:AlmostCrimes

Z.

Hello there, AlmostCrimes:

Thanks for your message. I usually rarely get anything, other than from deletionists, vandals, and robots, so it's refreshing to hear from a human. I'm glad that you enjoyed that flow of words about what constitutes sanity! Despite my putting inverted commas around 'fitting in[to]', it was indeed entirely written by me, (otherwise, I would have attributed it.)

Best wishes,

--It's-is-not-a-genitive 11:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wake Up Album Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wake Up Album Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Suicide Makers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Suicide Makers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brag and Cuss.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brag and Cuss.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Open.PNG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Open.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Malia Obama

You have Malia's birthdate incorrect. Please see the discussion Talk:Barack Obama/Archive 15#Children in infobox for a discussion that includes a reliable source I found for her actual date of birth. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Chicken has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 13:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing. Hardyplants (talk) 14:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Rush Limbaugh. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Zsero (talk) 15:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]