User talk:Allirelandunbiased

Please listen.

I don't understand why you refuse to engage in discussion - that's how it's done around here, and if you can't abide and respect that then that's your own fault. No one is victimising you, people are simply tired of you ignoring rules such as "Do not remove this block template" also ones such as "Do not edit other people's comments" (Which you did to the blocking admin) Your edits to a certain Golfers article don't interest me in the slightest, I have nothing personally against your views, but what I DO know is that you have to discuss any such changes on a talk page first when multiple editors revert you. These rules go for everybody. And I repeat, what you or user ÓCorcráin believe, I don't care about about any political or nationalism spectrum you belong to, I treat people equally. --Kawaii-Soft (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you felt the need to mention me in anyway whatsoever, it paints the picture to people that I support disruption. ÓCorcráin (talk) 13:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finally a normal person, not jumping on the band wagon

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Rory McIlroy. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 18:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove active block notices from user talk pages. Per WP:REMOVED, any notices regarding active sanctions (which includes block notices) may not be removed. If you continue to remove the block notice, I will revoke your ability to edit your talk page for the duration of the block. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 19:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--John (talk) 20:10, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove active block notices from user talk pages. Per WP:REMOVED, any notices regarding active sanctions (which includes block notices) may not be removed. If you continue to remove the block notice, you may lose your ability to edit your talk page for the duration of the block. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]