User talk:Allen234

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Krishna worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. PrinceOfCanada-HG (talk) 10:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Multiverse has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Krawi talk 09:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You edited Edwin Hubble to show Nobel Prize in his honors. I'm assuming that you did that in good faith having perhaps misunderstood the previous section. As he was never awarded the Nobel Prize, I have removed this mistaken information for you.--Alkhowarizmi (talk) 15:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CBD Belapur

Hello, Allen234. Thanks for your edit to the CBD Belapur article. However the text you have added CBD Belapur has a nice view in Sector 8b Area where in the rainy season the clouds look very beatiful and it looks like a hill station seems to be a Personal opinion and is not accepted on Wikipedia. Thanks, Kensplanet^Talk_{Contributions} 16:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Royal society foundation prize

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 13:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What a minor edit is

Please review Help:Minor edit. You have been designating "minor" edits that have substance and do not meet the accepted Wikipedia definition of "minor." For example, adding the sentence It was first observed by Jeremiah Horrocks to Transit of Venus, or adding a "known for" section to the infobox at Aristotle are definitely not minor. It will be helpful to other editors who may wish to build on your contributions or even refine or correct them, if the edits have not been "snuck in" as minor. Another editor has reverted your changes to Jeremiah Horrocks as vandalism; I'm not sure whether that was justified or not, but Wikipedia works on consensus, so it's best to be sure that dialogue (including on article talk pages) is fostered for anything that may be doubtful or controversial. Wareh (talk) 18:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fool's medal

A tag has been placed on Fool's medal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 20:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 04:55, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Ernest Rutherford, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. [1] / edg ☺ ☭ 12:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Celestial mechanics, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. [2] / edg ☺ ☭ 12:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Augustine Pinto

A tag has been placed on Augustine Pinto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Ray (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]