User talk:Allcatsarebabes

This is Allcatsarebabes's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avery Alder (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The game The Quiet Year is the subject of most coverage and most of them mention Alder in a cursory capacity. Additional sources with significant coverage of Alder is necessary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Avery Alder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Allcatsarebabes! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tabletop games folks

Hi there! Thank you for putting some work into drafts for tabletop game designers. If you are ever interested in looking at existing drafts to work on, I have a number of my own existing drafts at User:BOZ/Draft pages, and a long list of deleted pages (drafts and articles) at User:BOZ/Games deletions#Designers and artists that can be restored if needed if you have the sources to improve them. Aside from those lists, I found a few other currently existing drafts for tabletop games people aside from your drafts (Draft:Giorgio De Michele (aka Erebus)., Draft:Johan Egerkrans, Draft:Joseph A. McCullough, Draft:Matthew Dawkins (author), namely). Any help you can lend anywhere would be awesome. :) BOZ (talk) 20:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I want to give you a more "official" and friendly welcome to Wikipedia. :) The above was more like ideas of what you could work on if you like, rather than an actual request for you to do anything. We ideally all treat this place as a collaborative environment, and everyone here chooses what they want to work on. You have chosen a tough area to work on, biographies of game designers, particularly indie designers, but you've got at least one draft article published which is an accomplishment in and of itself! That said, I respect your choice and hope you are able to get a lot accomplished in that area. I like to coordinate efforts between people, so if you can think of any way that I can be helpful in that, please let me know. My preferred area to work in is RPGs from the 1980s and 1990s as I have been the most successful finding sources for those. I have done some work on topics throughout the tabletop gaming industry, and I have definitely touched on topics related to indie RPGs, including getting the deleted articles on designers restored such as Vincent Baker and Meguey Baker (thanks for working on those!), Emily Care Boss, Joshua A.C. Newman, Clinton R. Nixon (wasn't deleted, but it almost was), Jared Sorensen, and Brennan Taylor (thanks for looking at that one also!), and starting articles on Rob Donoghue, Fred Hicks, Chad Underkoffler, and Matt Wilson (artist). I have started or contributed to many other gaming-related biographical articles, but nowadays I mostly write about the games themselves. BOZ (talk) 23:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for the welcome! I could use some help finding additional reliable sources for my drafts on designers Avery Alder and Jeeyon Shim (if they're still not ready yet, I'm not sure). I also made a draft for Hit Point Press and could use some help filling in their publications (I think I found all the ones that there are articles about, but I'm not sure about that either). I like to play a lot of games from the Forge era and the current era (not sure what the current era is even called), so I'm trying to fill in some of Wikipedia's gaps. Allcatsarebabes (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Roberts (game designer) has been accepted

Alex Roberts (game designer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 20:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonaya Kemper (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonaya Kemper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 12:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hi Allcatsarebabes! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Draft:Jeeyon Shim that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 01:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Allcatsarebabes (talk) 01:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hit Point Press (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hit Point Press and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avery Alder has been accepted

Avery Alder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 10:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeeyon Shim has been accepted

Jeeyon Shim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GRuban (talk) 01:22, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hit Point Press

Hello, Allcatsarebabes. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hit Point Press, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hit Point Press

Hello, Allcatsarebabes. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hit Point Press".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]