Jump to content

User talk:AllWeHaveIsTime

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello, Crypto.farm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 02:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Knowledge growth (April 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is taken mostly from https://www.princeton.edu/~moll/KGAT.pdf and has no context otherwise. Some sentences are copy-pasted directly from https://frankdiana.net/2018/10/31/the-growth-of-knowledge/
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Crypto.farm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


update 7-May-19: still a WIP, will be ready for second review from AngusWOOF within next 30 days. Thanks crypto.farm

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Knowledge growth, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.princeton.edu/~moll/KGAT.pdf and https://frankdiana.net/2018/10/31/the-growth-of-knowledge/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Knowledge growth saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07-MAY-19 update: I have received green light from Frank Diana to release his work, just need to ask him to forward to the submissions-en approval inbox now. I have re-worded to be less essay style, removed transition words, etc. Also added ref section at top with lots of relevant discussions/papers on the topic. Next new article for creation I will not make as text heavy right off the bat. Should be good to go soon! thanks, crypto.farm

May 2019

[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:54, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AllWeHaveIsTime (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I can see why at first glance experienced Wiki humans might potentially block my userpage. I do apologise for this initial oversight. To clarify, this handle was intend to be a personal username of the human Adam Brooks form Canada. I am sorry if it was not obvious right at the beginning of the user page, I was still practising writing text in 3rd person and linking the facts and truth about the name. I will amend it to be more clear right off the bat, once at your humble discretion, my editing privileges are back. I would like to evolve this userpage to become a human forward name associated with the crypto.farm characters and responsibly. My reasons for appeal are found below:

In an internet society that is plagued with nefarious corporate data that feeds into people's online decisions and habits, I would prefer hypothetically if in several decades times, when the search term "Crypto Farm" is applied, that Adam Brooks (a real physical human, founder, visionary, "farmer", and publicly advocating specimen) appears at some medium to high frequency, such that other humans may see useful context into my life, socials, family, companies, ideas, research, non-for-profits, travels, videos, etc. (a publicity risk I will take now, with hopes of never offending anyone to the point of them wanting to assassinate me or kidnap me for ransom, even though I have spread access to my crypto fortune across various continents and multi-sig access wallets, and money extortion is physically impossible without advanced Quantum SHA key cracking). Also if some mafia group out there wants to kidnap me and I get murdered or disappear one day because of association to founding crypto.farm, I guess that's how I go out. Then the stories and discussions will be even greater. These legit references will slowly start to spawn through my theoretical successes over the coming decades - instead of a social engineering play on a data series of my company's products and services, those to be honest, will be relatively easy to create with legitimate successes, and NEVER ever from this account/userpage or my keystrokes in general. That I am well aware is a COI (we have lots of COI's in the engineering consulting field, and to be a professional engineer, one must always act accordingly to avoid such obvious positions). I want Wiki and the World to know that any edits from crypto.farm is coming from Adam Brooks, and Adam Brooks only (and never bias or paid opinions, or some army of staff marketing writers, only in the CEO's spare time does he contribute and clean up the odd page he is reading), it will make the contributions very genuine. Plus there are already several well-known Adam Brooks' out there, and this so happens to be my unique pen name and trademarked name of my life. My real name is a very common name actually, there are thousands of us. Whereas crypto.farm is slightly more rare of a name, and is in fact a true pseudo-alias of Founder Adam Brooks, and also a super general futuristic term/verb of the common process. This name would be like the username "always clean", "computer recycling", "paper work", etc. It's just a generic top-level handle, that I am not going to hide multiple identities behind. I believe I got very lucky with acquiring this top-level domain from the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority - one could say it was the work of the universe itself, knowing I would serve society and the internet with the at most love, respect, and honour under this name, as farming has been, and always will be a vital part of our evolution. I have multiple verifiable claims to this name, and do intend to use it for the greater good of society, from now, until my death (I am only a quarter century old, leaving the remaining 75% of my life to become a seasoned Wiki veteran). Most engineering entrepreneurs of this era do not stay with their founded companies or handles until death, most start, flip them, move on and buy a new fancy property, then startup another company or handle, and the cycle repeats itself. Even this occurs with the Wall Street suits and Corporate Exec's, it's a funny observation that very few of them who are well-known actually sick with their own company/creation, most are never true founders of their company. Founding and staying with a company your whole life, is much like an artist or painter who signs the same name on all his works. Consistency in design. Being proud of your name. I am going to do my damned best to stay the founder and CEO of this company for as long as physically possible, to insure that we never unethically start to farm human souls, or force them to start thinking in a way that favours our financial profits. (for example, I'm working on a mental theory of a society that does not rely on monetary value). I actually hope crypto.farm will become so successful and independent one day, that we can make sure no one ever goes to bed hungry or mentally depressed over finances, in this super futuristic form of a truly decentralised and fair crypto habitat.

Now I could simply not go though all this extra typing and explanation (which I'm sure will happen again at some point in time), and simply apologise and request to change my user name to "randomcryptodude218921349137". But for one reason I do not want to lose my edit history on the "Knowledge growth" page, and I want to preserve this special name to build a positive reputation under. As consideration, I would like to provide three links below that are very public forward facing and link crypto.farm to myself a single human being - Adam Brooks, or Adam J. Brooks. There will be more proof to come over the coming decades of this association. As lets face it, when dealing with this new era of crypto actors, most people just hide behind random usernames with an infinite source of VPN's access, keeping the SEO indexers off Wiki is near impossible and I'm sure requires constant policing - what a waste of everyone's time, I agree it is not good for society, and I will do my best to keep an eye out for such users, and I never want to become such a 'target' or enemy of the system. At least with crypto.farm/Adam Brooks edits you know they will be coming straight from my mind, and be true to its name, fact, policy, source, and similarity to my website and permanent corporate values. Being a very busy human in my daily life (and always as a volunteer editor), I would like to contribute a few hours each month when I can under this username, and create the odd unique science page and positive contributions to the encyclopedia, in such topics of interest as listed on my userpage: nuclear science, cryptocurrency, and neurology/AI/human-synthetics type progressions. Please take a look at these three external human crypto.farm proof's:

My Discord account has Adam Brooks and Facebook verified as handle crypto.farm#4295 (Discord is massive in gaming and crypto industry, it runs off the open-source electron framework): https://crypto.farm/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/discord_public.png

Facebook page creation, job description, and link to myself as founder of the crypto.farm visual representation: https://crypto.farm/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/facebook-work-title-founder.png

WHOIS record from Cloudflare: (by default they redact all WHOIS info if you do an official ICANN lookup, here is snapshot from my dashboard, and the official IANA record) https://crypto.farm/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/whois-cloudflare.png

Thanks, and I look forward for all responses, from now until my death in about 70 years if all goes as planned, (knock on virtual wood)

I will add COI tag for my userpage and any business pagetalk in the future that would be considered a COI situation.


Sincerely, crypto.farm


This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Error: No article specified.


PS, this is one of my favourite memes, it is very accurate to real life circumstances. It is one reason I don't worry about being so public or human forward in my crypto ventures (as I have nothing bad to hide, and always stay on the clear-net, with hopes to always better society and maybe add the odd laugh out loud here and there). Keeping dark, its not in my DNA... for this life at least... "they" will likely find you no matter what....why live a life of constant looking over your shoulder? https://crypto.farm/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/security-meme.png

Crypto.farm (talk) 23:02, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't know what the above is supposed to be, as it is too long to read, but it is not an unblock request. This is only a username block, please follow the instructions in the block notice to propose a new username, or you may create a new account yourself with a username policy compliant username. 331dot (talk) 01:05, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AllWeHaveIsTime (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Using correct 'unblock-un' and not 'unblock' request this time. To reiterate, this handle was intend to be a personal username of the human Adam Brooks form Canada. I am sorry if it was not obvious right at the beginning of the user page, I will amend it to be more clear right off the bat, once at your humble discretion, my username is approved for life long use. If you really want to dive deep, and learn of my good intentions with keeping this name, where it is linked to my personal life, and maybe crack a laugh or two, please read above section in orange. Thanks Adam

Decline reason:

"crypto.farm is (in your own words) an active domain resolving website address open to all nations." This is more than just a personal website, blog, or social media account. You will need to choose a username that reflects you as an individual. You might also want to read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID if they apply. DlohCierekim 12:52, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the actual content

[edit]

of the website in question is at vari ance with its description here and on the sandbox page. The website in question describes itself as a "Cryptocurrency Farm" and contains product information and a link for placing orders. Which I had inferred already without actually looking.12:58, 8 May 2019 (UTC) DlohCierekim


final thoughts on username

[edit]

Understood all, sorry for the ruckus. Now after one sleep cycle, I can see how this would be confusing to 99% of the population. Will change to a new username :)


@Justlettersandnumbers: Hello, thanks for noticing this before it got way too confusing for everyone. I have a new view on life now. Question, once new name change is approved, could you grant me access to Science Direct database, or what are the requirements? I see you are a member. When I was back in my Masters at Queen's University, it was my go to resource. Would be nice to look up the odd article now and reference. PS: you might like my new proposed username, see below, definitely check out the movie Lucy if you have not. It's kind of is similar, or the polar opposite to your username, by random coincidence. I'm not sure. Crypto.farm (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dlohcierekim: Yes that totally makes sense. I forget how new and different things can look to an outside viewer, after spending hundreds of hours on your own website, one can get lost in how it is perceived. Thanks for the reality check. Interesting your initial guess into the website function merely based off a name, I guess if crypto = dollar then that is the way general society is heading, although one of my real purposes once I have research funding will be to build more of an open source educational based system and design firm, and not so much about retail commerce for say. I have made a promise to myself to cut back on the farming analogies as well for my own sanity. Crypto.farm (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

AllWeHaveIsTime (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Agreed to change username. I got inspired by this name several years ago from the 2014 movie Lucy directed by Luc Besson, where Lucy is at 60-70% cerebral cortex function and there is one scene where she is manipulating matter and talking to a group a scientists about the insignificance and wrong direction we took on quantifying numbers, when all in fact we have is time.Crypto.farm (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I've renamed and unblocked your account. PhilKnight (talk) 20:55, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to URX

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to URX added the name of an apparently non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AllWeHaveIsTime&oldid=1145655416"