User talk:AllStarZ

EVE Online

Hello, regarding your cleanup tag on EVE Online could you be more specific as to which style guidelines it does not meet. -- Richard Slater (Talk to me!) 12:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Ello

I see that ES has more people here than I'd ever suspected. Logical2u_Talk 23:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be working for me. Maybe a bit slow. You go to the direct link? Logical2u_Discuss! 22:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I let the IRC channel know, there have been some scattered complaints about it, but no one has much clue what's going. Did you check for hijacking? Logical2u_Discuss! 23:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to [[:Talk: :D]]. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Thank you. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 01:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red Alert

You don't delete what is nearly half of the content of an article's main body - which others have spend considerably time on in the recent past - solely on your own decision, and expect not to be confronted with any reverts. Discuss in detail what alterations and trims you would like to see within the article's discussion page first and why, and we'll probably reach a consensus on what is best removed and what is best to retain sooner rather than later. But until then, your edits are going to remain undone as they frankly affect far too much of the article in a far too arbitrary manner. It's nothing personal though. 84.192.112.65 17:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

San Theodoros

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article San Theodoros, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Staves in popular culture

Great work. Let's hope it stays that way. :) Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:40, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

M3 Lee in M4 Sherman

(copied from my talk page)

How does it make more sense? The section effectively reads as though the 37 mm gun turret at the top of the tank contributed to the high silhouette, whereas the sponson mounting section reads as separate section, listing the disadvantage of the gun solely in terms of its sponson mounting.

Also, it is a run-on sentence.

AllStarZ (talk) 17:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Because the 37mm gun turret did indeed contribute to the high silhouette, and the main disadvantage of the sponson mounting of the 75 mm was indeed the fact that it had a restricted arc of fire. The main reason for the high silhouette was the radial engine of course, which is why the M4 also had a high silhouette despite having neither a sponson gun nor a 37 mm gun turret. The preceding M2 didn't have a sponson 75 mm yet its silhouette was as high as the M3.

The current sentence is far from perfect but it is better than the alternatives so far. I don't agree it is a run-on sentence but it certainly could be improved. Regards, DMorpheus (talk) 17:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AllStarZ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AllStarZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AllStarZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]