User talk:AllQoo

Speedy deletion of Syncexpert

A tag has been placed on Syncexpert, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NuclearWarfare (talk) 04:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied the contents of this page to User:AllQoo/SyncEXPERT. I'll need to know what the other page you're talking about is before I can comment on it. –xenocidic (talk) 12:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For a piece of software to be included in Wikipedia, it must meet our general criteria for notability as outlined here. Some or all of those other examples you mentioned may not in fact meet these guidelines and therefore can be proposed or nominated for deletion (if you desire). If you can improve the User:AllQoo/SyncEXPERT page to show that it meets our criteria for notability then you can attempt to recreate it in the mainspace. –xenocidic (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

AllQoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

59.148.47.86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Rule Outed". The reason given for Rule Outed's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rule O

Blocking administrator: Timotheus Canens (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: The evidence strongly suggests that you are the same person as Rule Outed, and also your editing indicates a spam only account. Consequently, this account will be blocked too. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts, and promotional editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]