User talk:Alisonwoods13

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with formatting the citations in my article. Looks like I may have made some errors with dates? Also, this entire process is not totally clear to me -- will someone review my draft and upload it to Wikipedia if it's deemed acceptable?

Thank you!

Alisonwoods13 (talk) 02:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You were throwing errors on the dates because they need to be in the format day Month Year (e.g. 27 October 2016). The "title=" errors are because you have not added a |title= parameter to the {{cite web}} template. Check out WP:REFB (in particular Section 3.1) for more about references. I have added a draft submission notice at the top of the page, so when you feel the page is ready for submission you can click the "submit your draft" button. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 02:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Portia Munson has been accepted

Portia Munson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 03:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with adding titles to my citations from websites. I seem to have done something terribly wrong as I tried to simply delete a citation that was flagged for lack of title and use the template to replace with one that would have a field for title (title should be "Artist biography"). The flagged citation in question is from the website of the gallery that represents the artist. There is another similar citation later in the article, which I would like to title "Artist CV" (the source is the artist's website).

Thank you for your help. This is all very new to me. I can write, but this stuff ... not so much.

Alisonwoods13 (talk) 03:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the immediate issues. WP:Referencing for beginners and Template:Cite web provide some information on how to create and edit refereces. Huon (talk) 04:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Lyght (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What establishes notability is museum collections or major art reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Lyght and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Andrew Lyght concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Andrew Lyght, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:16, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew Lyght

Hello, Alisonwoods13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew Lyght".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 18:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello. I've finished an article (shown below), and would like to submit it for review and publication on Wikipedia. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do. Thank you!

User:Alisonwoods13/sandbox/Richard Bosman (artist)

Alisonwoods13 (talk) 00:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When you are ready to submit, simply add {{subst:submit}} to the top of your draft and save ("Publish") it.

Before you do that, I suggest that you add references that actually support the claims made in the draft. If your claims are true, Bosman likely meets the criteria for NARTIST, but as it stands, you don't provide references that would let us verify the claims; they are just identifications. Also, we only use a "retrieved date" field when referring to ephemeral sources such as web URLs.

The other thing that appears to be lacking in your draft are Wikilinks to other articles that would make it easier for a reader to explore topics mentioned in the draft. Everything from Hudson Valley to Neo-expressionism are sufficiently uncommon that they could be linked this way (on the other hand, linking "New York" would generally not be done). These links will likely be provided by other editors if your draft were to be accepted as an article and would not be a reason for declining it. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Bosman has been accepted

Richard Bosman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 02:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Richard Bosman) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Richard Bosman.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Richard Bosman.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Lyght (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The fact that they have been covered in the New York Times is very promising. But I would like to see at least 1, or preferably 2 more reliable and independent sources with significant coverage. That, or proof that they meet some part of WP:NARTIST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Lyght and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrew Lyght, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 08:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alisonwoods13! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 08:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Lyght has been accepted

Andrew Lyght, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

For creating Andrew Lyght. Keep up the good work! Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]