User talk:Alimosser61
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Your first edits
[edit]Good job leaving a note on my talk page ([1]). I see you did not leave a proper signature; check Wikipedia:Signature for information on how to sign your posts properly, and then come back to my talk page and add a signature there. Don't forget to add yourself to your group here. Do ask me questions if you need further assistance! Keep up the good job, and try making more edits on Wikipedia to get a feel for it! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 22:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Good job so far. Please note that the first deadline required that you also comment on an article's talk page, and add yourself you to the group. You may want to do so for extra credit (at that point it is too late to do so for the deadline point); let me know if you do so.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 01:10, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
The citation looks good. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:58, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
See also
[edit]I appreciate that Family in advertising is a bit orphaned at the moment, but it's not that helpful to the reader to include tenuous see-also links from articles such as mother or magazine. If there's a two-step link from one article to another ("mothers are part of families, and families are used in advertising", "magazines include advertising, and advertisements sometimes include families") then the see-also probably isn't appropriate - concentrate on the direct connections. --McGeddon (talk) 18:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice.
Alimosser61 (talk) 18:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:KellogsAdFamily1977.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:KellogsAdFamily1977.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We hope (talk) 04:10, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
If you like, I can find an ad picturing a family that's free use for your article. Just let me know if you want help with this on my talk page. We hope (talk) 04:10, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
File:KellogsAdFamily1977.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KellogsAdFamily1977.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC) We hope (talk) 17:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please see my comment at Talk:Family_in_advertising#Image_review which should provide more helpful information. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 19:42, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Don't cross things out
[edit]I posted this on your buddy's page: [2] You don't cross things out, the reviewer does. you post comments about the item's status. PumpkinSky talk 13:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)