User talk:Alijala1975

This is Alijala1975's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajendra Bharadwaj (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajendra Bharadwaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rajendra Bharadwaj, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 23:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alijala1975! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lapablo (talk) 23:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Dorakuna Ituvanti Seva.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dorakuna Ituvanti Seva.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dorakuna Ituvanti Seva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dorakuna Ituvanti Seva, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorakuna Ituvanti Seva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dorakuna Ituvanti Seva.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dorakuna Ituvanti Seva.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your article ధ‌ర్మ‌స్థ‌లి

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page ధ‌ర్మ‌స్థ‌లి to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. Pages in foreign languages will not be kept here, and may be deleted if they are not translated into English. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bhairavi (2009 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhairavi (2009 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhairavi (2009 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 23:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

Hi it seems you are only interested in Rajendra Bharadwaj's articles. Anyhow, you must mention any connections on your user page. DareshMohan (talk) 23:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajendra Bharadwaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajendra Bharadwaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajendra Bharadwaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent work

Hi, saw your work in Bhojpuri cinema. Just wanted to say thanks for creating the articles. DareshMohan (talk) 23:45, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alijala1975/sandbox

A tag has been placed on Alijala1975/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sahari Bagha

The article Sahari Bagha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of reliable sources. Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Please add reliable sources in Odia language. Do not remove the PROD tag without improvement. DareshMohan (talk) 01:21, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sitaramula Kalyanam Chuthamu Raarandi

Hello, Alijala1975,

Thank you for creating Sitaramula Kalyanam Chuthamu Raarandi.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for the article. However, the citation style is unclear, it would be better to have in-line citations, see Help:Referencing. Moreover, as per WP:GNG, multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources constituting of significant coverage is required, excluding minor news stories and routine announcements. The sources currently appear to al be short announcements on updates, opening photos, and minor production details. The guidelines at the film notability guideline, WP:NFILM, also appear to be failed, unless you could show two reviews by nationally known critics. Therefore, could you find some more in-depth articles or some reviews? Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 21:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sitaramula Kalyanam Chuthamu Raarandi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sitaramula Kalyanam Chuthamu Raarandi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sitaramula Kalyanam Chuthamu Raarandi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VickKiang (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sahari Bagha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sahari Bagha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahari Bagha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 23:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sita Ramanka Bahaghara Kali Jugare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sita Ramanka Bahaghara Kali Jugare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sita Ramanka Bahaghara Kali Jugare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VickKiang (talk) 02:36, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kasam Durga Ki (2019 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kasam Durga Ki (2019 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasam Durga Ki (2019 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VickKiang (talk) 02:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]