User talk:Alifaz1980

September 2023

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Babar Javed. Thank you. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is based on the career of our Bose Babar Javed which did not include the details of the new work done and the new awards received. Therefore, it was necessary to include details of his works and awards which are not already in this article. As for my two IDs, first I was changing my personal ID Alifaz1980 by people and then I changed it by creating my official ID BJPproduction2022. The intention was that since BJ Productions is Babar javed's company, I would update this article of his with the id created in the name of this production and there was no reason to create another id. BJProduction2022 Alifaz1980 (talk) 11:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Babar Javed

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Babar Javed, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for egregious promotion and advertising, as you did at Babar Javed.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 16:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alifaz1980 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please sir unblock it as soon as possible, I need to update that article "Babar Javed", There is no any mislead information, I tried to in put any information in that article with references. So please resolve that issue

Decline reason:

I reviewed the request made by your sockpuppet. You were attempting to have the same unduly promotional material added to the article. So, not only do you not understand Wikipedia's policies about WP:NPOV and editorial guidelines like WP:PEACOCK, but you are abusing multiple accounts. —C.Fred (talk) 11:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I see your sockpuppet is making the same request at User talk:BJProduction2022. Doug Weller talk 09:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 18:49, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry: Repeated attempts may lead to a ban from the project

Faisal.Shaikh1980 was created after this account was blocked indefinitely and is an obvious sockpuppet. A second such incident, if confirmed by a CheckUser, would lead to you being banned indefinitely from the project. —C.Fred (talk) 11:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]