User talk:Alice23A305134
September 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 134 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 07:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC) The stable life of a young guy will be changed completely as a strange boy enters his life.
The strange boy claims the young guy is actually the rightful heir to the throne, this information has obviously been kept secret by the current holders of the throne, but once this information gets out to the public the people will surely stand behind the true heir. Concerned of the situation and a little distrusful of this strange boy, the young guy oddly enthusiastically agrees to the proposal, it all seemed rather odd, but there was no time to waste and a choice had to be made.
But what if this strange boy is a con artist. Or what if this is all far bigger than what has been told. How could an ordinary young guy be relied upon in something this big. Time to find out.The stable life of a young guy will be changed completely as a strange boy enters his life.
The strange boy claims the young guy is actually the rightful heir to the throne, this information has obviously been kept secret by the current holders of the throne, but once this information gets out to the public the people will surely stand behind the true heir. Concerned of the situation and a little distrusful of this strange boy, the young guy oddly enthusiastically agrees to the proposal, it all seemed rather odd, but there was no time to waste and a choice had to be made.
But what if this strange boy is a con artist. Or what if this is all far bigger than what has been told. How could an ordinary young guy be relied upon in something this big. Time to find out.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Shellwood (talk) 07:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bishonen | talk 07:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)Alice23A305134 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- That's pointless. In the unblock request, you're supposed to write a reason why we would want to unblock you. In view of your edits, it would need to be a good reason. It's obvious from your timestamp that you haven't even glanced at the Guide to appealing blocks. Bishonen | talk 08:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC).