User talk:Alic.Mat23

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Alic.Mat23, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 02:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hawazi Daipi (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More accounts on his career and political endeavours are a better fit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hawazi Daipi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hawazi Daipi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 13:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alic.Mat23! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 13:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ronny Santana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronny Santana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronny Santana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Milanblocks

Hello Alic.Mat23,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Milanblocks for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:07, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Giacomo Ciufoli

Hello Alic.Mat23,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Giacomo Ciufoli for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NK Forster Guitars

The article NK Forster Guitars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 17:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bilby (talk) 03:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alic.Mat23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This was my first and only account at Wikipedia. Bilby, Kindly inform me accounts which you are reffering to me? How I am linked with these?

Decline reason:

I have extensively examined the editing history of this and a number of other accounts. It is perfectly clear that this account has edited in collaboration with other accounts, and virtually certain that it has been operated by the same person as at least some of those other accounts. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alic.Mat23 (talk) 04:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The master account was User:IMZahidIqbal. The last known sock of IMZahidIqbal was blocked on January 16. This account started editing 2 days later, and continued to engage in undisclosed paid editing. - Bilby (talk) 13:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please disclose as required by WP:PAID. Please list any accounts you have edited with. Please disclose accounts of any other user(s) with whom you have coordinated edits. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bilby,User:Dlohcierekim I cannot understand how you linked me with this account. Kindly tell me the reason and edits which you are claiming we did mutually or coordinated?Alic.Mat23 (talk) 11:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. I've no interest in telling people how I recognize socking, and I'm sure no one else does. Might was well request input from JamesBWatson as they actually declined the unblock. However, the essence of my post was that you read and heed WP:PAID and that you come forward with any other user names you've used or coordinated with. Thanks, --Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]