User talk:Ali R. Abbas

August 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Talking Tom & Friends (TV series) episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tube·of·Light 10:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't meant to vandalize, I didn't know how to do that template that time. Ali R. Abbas (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Talking Tom & Friends (TV series) episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Tube·of·Light 10:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Talking Tom & Friends (TV series) episodes. Tube·of·Light 04:34, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pocoyo, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:33, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Lamput into Draft:List of Lamput episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to Lamput, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Lamput episodes

The article List of Lamput episodes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources don't support that WP:NLIST is met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Lamput episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Lamput episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lamput episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:34, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manager Hasan's World Tales for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manager Hasan's World Tales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manager Hasan's World Tales until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello Ali R. Abbas. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Manager Hasan's World Tales, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ali R. Abbas. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ali R. Abbas|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Leaving you this because you wrote "We were not ready to publish, because we didn't finish working on our show". Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SpongeBob SquarePants (season 14) has been accepted

SpongeBob SquarePants (season 14), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Writing fictional plot summaries

Hi, I noticed that you are trimming down the plots for the Ninjago seasons. While I don't disagree with this, I think you should take more care with your sentence structure, grammar etc, and particularly, you should read WP:FICTENSE, which states that fictional plots should be written in the present tense rather than the past tense. Fieryninja (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you have heavily edited the summaries of the List of Talking Tom & Friends (TV series) episodes. As above, please work on your grammar and sentence structure as you have made a lot of the entries unintelligible Balkris (talk) 11:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]