User talk:Alhamza1999

Welcome!

Hello, Alhamza1999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mohammed Hameed, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammed Hameed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mohammed Hameed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues

Hello Alhamza1999, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Twofortnights (talk) 20:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Mohammed Hameed Farhan, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Visa requirements for Iraqi citizens, you may be blocked from editing. --Twofortnights (talk) 14:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 11:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Iraq national football team. Thirdright (talk) 17:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Visa requirements for German citizens, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:34, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Visa policy of Ecuador, you may be blocked from editing. --Twofortnights (talk) 21:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not continue the disruption after the edit has been reverted, like what you did to Visa policy of Nepal. The reverts are there for a reason. The information on Timatic for Nepal is already very clear and precise. If you continue to cause disruptions, you may be blocked from editing. --TreasureCheff3 (talk) 02:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Visa requirements for Jordanian citizens. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Septrillion (talk) 05:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Visa requirements for Jordanian citizens, you may be blocked from editing. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:15, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Visa requirements for Jordanian citizens. --TreasureCheff3 (talk) 11:55, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Visa policy of Kuwait. Shellwood (talk) 04:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning! Stop your disruptive contributions to Wikipedia! You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize, like what you did to Visa policy of Dominica.--Experimentalist35 (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Visa policy of Bolivia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Twofortnights (talk) 17:23, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 18:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive contributions to Wikipedia! You need to learn to use the talk page to discuss future edits rather than creating a recurring edit war with someone. If you continue to engage in an edit war on Wikipedia articles, you may be blocked from editing. Thanks!--Experimentalist35 (talk) 17:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Visa policy of Antigua and Barbuda.--TreasureCheff3 (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Visa policy of Egypt, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Twofortnights (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Visa policy of Iraq, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Twofortnights (talk) 23:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Letter case

Please have a look at the following article - Letter case.--Twofortnights (talk) 15:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Visa requirements for Palestinian citizens. Serols (talk) 07:38, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Alhamza1999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21370 was submitted on Apr 29, 2018 18:16:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC) Unblocking case[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alhamza1999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im really sad because iget blocked i like to contribute more and more in visa pages i got blocked without any reason i was just trying to edit a page and then i got blocked please accept my appeal Alhamza1999 (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This page is full of warnings others have left you about your inappropriate edits. They stretch back many months and include two previous blocks. If you still don't see why your contributions are unhelpful, it's very likely that the problems would recur if you were unblocked. Huon (talk) 21:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.