User talk:Alfy32

Money and State

Hello Alfy. I placed a number of tags on the article you recently started. I hope you will view them constructively and make use of them as you find sources to improve the article. SPECIFICO talk 00:18, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SPECIFICO yes indeed thank you very much, I am currently working to improve the article and I posted a comment on the relevant Talk page to explain the article's intent and to solicit other editors' contributions. Alfy32 (talk) 00:22, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Separation of money and state, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Repression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Separation of money and state for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Separation of money and state is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Separation of money and state until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — goethean 21:08, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support for libertarian economics

There just aren't enough editors who are familiar with libertarian economics to support the addition of important and notable articles. I've had plenty of articles deleted by people who've never even heard of J.S. Mill or Bastiat or Herbert Spencer or any other libertarian economist. Take a look at my user page...User:Xerographica. Quite a few of those articles have been deleted...so I just created subpages for them. Perhaps down the road a few more people who know about libertarian economics might join Wikipedia and vote to keep notable economic concepts. --Xerographica (talk) 13:32, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Solicitation/Votestacking

Alfy, Please have a look at this section of the Money and State talk page: Alfy -- RE: Deletion Process [1] Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 14:29, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SPECIFICO has told me that he did not intend to WP:SHOUT when adding all that bold print, either here or elsewhere. – S. Rich (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

You linked WP:IMPERFECT in one of the discussions. It served to focus my attention on a particular and important policy. I sometimes get overly bold with my deletions of unsourced material. So I shall keep your subtle/not-so-subtle hint (even if not directed towards me) in mind. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 17:55, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Monetary sovereignty. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I'm not sure which template to apply: AGF or NPA. But the point is that this edit: [2] was improper. You copied & pasted comments from an unrelated discussion and mis-applied them. Specifically, you referred to SPECIFIO's comment about the Goodrich Blimp on WP:Articles for deletion/Separation of money and state, which pertained to another article, and posted them as if they applied to Monetary sovereignty. Perhaps this was careless or mistaken editing; nevertheless, I ask you to be more careful and considerate. – S. Rich (talk) 22:16, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

You actions here, here, here, here, and here, appears to violate our policy WP:CANVAS. Please read and understand the policy against canvassing, that is, informing, inviting or encouraging like minded people to participate in a dispute on Wikipedia. Thank you. LK (talk) 04:20, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message seems to duplicate the concern raised above at User talk:Alfy32#Solicitation/Votestacking. The link there goes to the notification and Alfy32's response. I trust the issue is resolved. – S. Rich (talk) 04:38, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two of the invitees have already weighed in on the AfD. To my knowledge, nobody has brought this to the attention of whichever admins will ultimately be involved in closing the case, and I am not familiar with whatever protocols or procedures govern such a situation. SPECIFICO talk 05:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

Hey, thanks for letting me know about the monetary sovereignty thing, and thanks for the constructive edits. I'm going to undo some of that other guy's stuff and add some more references... Supposedly I'm supposed to get updates when there's changes to that page, but I never do... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetrasho (talk • contribs) 13:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RGW

Alfy, I suggest you go back to Talk:Monetary sovereignty and ~~strikeout~~ your comments about vandalism. WP:NOT VANDALISM gives a lot of info about this topic. Accusing or implying that another editor has vandalized WP, when such is not the case, is bad practice. By striking out unfounded allegations, you will enhance your standing in the community. I've admitted my mistakes, said I was wrong, and apologized for past actions. And keeping those apologizes in mind should help me avoid future mistakes. I hope you will do so as well. Best regards. – S. Rich (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Separation of money and state concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Separation of money and state, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Separation of money and state

Hello Alfy32. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Separation of money and state".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Separation of money and state}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 09:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Money as Debt III - Evolution Beyond Money

[3] have u watched this film? --Namaste@^? 18:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alfy32. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]