User talk:Alfredo elejalde

Gōjū-ryū

Could you read Wikipedia:External links please and get back to me? Thanks --Nate1481(^t/_c) 16:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UserRfC

With point a), I agree with you but because this is outside my pervue, I didn't do anything in terms of movement (moving the information around). I would guess if that is an issue, you can feel free to move it.

With point e), Tables are necessary because the information is stastistical. I don't see the wasted space and yes, they are not easy to manage, but the pages of wikipedia are for readers, not editors. Yes, tables maybe cut into two or three pages (I've never tried), but if a table is big, then that's the baggage that comes with tables. I sympathize with your feeling that the nontable is better (I don't feel that way, but), but unfortunately, we have to keep information easy to read and readable.68.148.164.166 (talk) 07:39, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About tables: there is not one statistical piece of information in the tables you are talking about. You can see the wasted space when you compare the amount of information in each column. Some of them are crowded with information, some of them are almost empty, with just one or two words. If there were no crowded cells in some columns of the table, it may be a good format. But it is not the case. About the length of the tables: there should be no baggage, We, editors, must help the reader. Readers must have access to documents that can be printed easily, so it is not a feeling about tables or sympathy what I am asking for, but a decision to benefit the reader, not our editing likes or dislikes. Now, in what sense a table is easier to read than the traditional prose, with subtitles, bold, italic and underline texts?

I just need a good reason to change my mind. On the other hand, an editing of such importance (eliminating prose and usin tables, or viceversa) should be consulted with other editors before being done. Alfredo elejalde (talk) 18:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the length of the table may be too long, but we cannot cleave it just for people who print the articles. Some of the cells maybe crowded just because of that face that the information is not much. Say romanji, you really can't add more than a phrase in the cell. It's just the nature of the article. And that is statistical information. Statistics does not always mean numbers. The infomation can be categorized into variables. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.148.164.166 (talk) 19:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saifa

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Saifa, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.yorkkarate.com/goju.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Saifa

A tag has been placed on Saifa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Gōjū-ryū do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 18:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, see the discussion page. My answer is there. 190.43.128.155 (talk) 03:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]