User talk:Alfred Kinsey

Welcome!

Hello, Alfred Kinsey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Spitfire^Tally-ho! 18:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Werdnawerdna

Substantial and creditable evidence has been presented to me that it is highly likely you are Werdnawerdna (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log), a permanently banned user. Further, you are repeating the actions that led to his banning. Therefore, after investigation, I have taken the decision to apply an indefinite block to this account. ++Lar: t/c 22:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Kinsey

Hollywood versions of movies such as Kinsey with Liam Neeson, even when they say "it's based on true story," are always watered down with lots of added fiction, and lots of left-out facts. As a result, they are incredibly bias and short-sighted, and should only be considered entertainment rather than informational or educational.

I'm definitely no religious extremist by any means, far from it, but "satanic cultist" are just as ridiculous as religious extremists, if not more so. Well, Kinsey was interested in obtaining occultist Aleister Crowley's diaries, so Kinsey can include Crowley's satanic-based sexual practices and teachings into his publications about male and female sexuality. Whether you believe satanist practices to be a real danger, or to be just a ridiculous cult of mentally disturbed people with too much free time on their hands, it definitely shouldn't be used as a base reference to define the sexuality and sexual behavior of the average and common everyday person.

Kinsey claimed to have proven, based upon the mostly deviant samples used in his research, that 95 percent of Americans engaged in deviant sex, and thus were sex offenders by nature. I REPEAT...he based his "research" mostly on deviant samples.

Kinsey believed that all deviant sex was legitimate — pedophilia, bestiality, incest, adultery, prostitution, sadomasochism — and he worked to overthrow and/or weaken all laws prohibiting any of these.

He and his associates also testified and wrote in favor of parole for sex offenders and violent felons, was greatly responsible for the reduction of penalties for rapists and child molesters, and the release of these repeat offenders back into society. Many children and women have been brutally victimized as a result of these Kinsey-inspired "reforms."

Kinsey’s impact on American law provides evidence of the deceitful coordination and collaboration between Kinsey and key members of the ALI to overthrow the Common Law and constitutional underpinnings of the legal protections provided against sexual predators.

Prior to Kinsey, rape was treated as a heinous crime in keeping with the Common Law standard. If convicted, rapists faced mandatory execution in three states, the possibility of a death penalty in 20 states, and a minimum of a 20-year sentence in all but one of the states. Kinsey changed all that. Now — women and children — are victimized twice: once by sexual crimes and vice, and again by the changed laws that refuse to penalize the perpetrator. This is Kinsey’s legacy.

Kinsey portrayed himself as a normal family man and devoted father from Indiana University in conservative Bloomington, Indiana, but he was a sadomasochist (deriving of pleasure, especially sexual gratification, from inflicting or submitting to physical or emotional abuse) who not only tried but often times succeeded to push his wife and his Kinsey Institute colleagues into engaging in humiliating, violent, and destructive sex acts. He actually filmed many of these sessions in his attic. He immersed himself in every kind of sexual deviancy that he found, and as usually happens with such persons, it was taking on more and more bizarre and painful stimuli to arouse himself, such as sexual self-mutilation by the cutting up of his own penis.

Kinsey’s interview techniques involved leading and instructing the subject to obtain the answers Kinsey wanted. And when the subjects still didn’t give the desired answers — meaning, they didn’t admit to engaging in the sexual activity Kinsey wanted them to admit to — Kinsey regularly dismissed their responses, and wrote down what he thought their answers should be anyways. All of this was necessary, of course, in order to obtain much higher reports of the deviant and destructive sexual behavior that he did himself was hooked on, so it could then be redefined as "normal," and commonplace. Kinsey used and instructed criminal pedophiles to sexually abuse children, including infants, in the name of "research."

Kinsey stands condemned by his own "research," but no one seems to have the courage to declare the obvious. Most people including government officials, as well as the scientific community continue to assume he was legit and credible based on the fact that he was able to get funding initially through a legitimate University and college-related funding source. Which by the way, anybody with the right connections can get.

Kinsey claimed that his data proved that children are "sexual" from birth. What was this based upon? According to the admission of his associates (see video clips), such as Wardell Pomeroy and Paul Gebhard, much of this data came from an habitual pedophile Kinsey code-named "Mr. Green" (also referred to sometimes as "Mr. X"), who had molested as many as 800 boys and girls over many years, and who kept meticulous records of his exploits. We now know that this predatory pervert was Rex King, a U.S. government land examiner, who traveled about Arizona, New Mexico, and the Southwest. Much of Kinsey’s data comes from the diaries of this monster who sexually tortured children, some infants as young as three months, and recorded their screams of pain as "orgasms." Instead of being repulsed and horrified by this, as any normal person would be, Kinsey was tantalized. He told King, "I congratulate you on the research spirit, which has led you to collect data over these many years." He assured King that his insidious criminal activity had great scientific importance. Research spirit! We do not know how many other violent pedophiles, even child murderers, Kinsey may have used and instructed as "researchers." Nor do we know for certain how many children Kinsey and/or members of his staff directly abused themselves, but there is evidence in their own notes that they were present, and at least witnessed some of this activity.

So Kinsey thought the "alleged" fact that an infant could have an orgasm, and also thought that was more important "scientifically" than the reality of rampant child abuse!? He geared, garnished, and manipulated all of his research and data.

The Kinsey study of 1948, cites that anywhere between than 10% and 35% of the population are homosexual and lesbian. What kind of study has such a wide range in percentage? This study involved is also based on a disproportionate number of people who had been in jail for sex crimes (hardly a random sample of the population).

Much more current research based on the study, "Scope and Nature of Child" conducted at Princeton in 1994, shows that the true percentage of homosexuals and lesbians are in the 1-2% range of the entire U.S. population. Homosexuals commit more than 33% of all reported child molestations in the United States, which, since homosexuals make up 1-2% of the population, means that's anywhere from 1 out of every 10 to 1 out of 20 homosexuals is a child molester, while 1 out 490 heterosexuals is a child molester.

The bottom line is Kinsey always used fraudulent data and methods, which has been both directly and indirectly admitted by many of his colleagues. He repeatedly used abnormal and deviant samples of males and females for his study, and then claimed that the sexual practices of these groups were representative of the activity of the common men and women on the whole.

His male sampling use to publish his book on Male sexuality was heavy with pedophiles, pederasts, convicts, pimps, and other sexually aggressive males whom he recruited at bars, clubs, and bath houses, so these were completely unrepresentative of the average American male. There's no way in hell that the average male's sexuality and sexual behavior should be defined by that of a pedophile's, a convict's, or a pimp's. All I have to say to that is, wtf?!

The same was true of his female studies that were used as a source for his female sexuality book that was published. Female study groups consisted of mainly incest and rape victims, nude magazine models, porn stars, prostitutes, and strippers. Kinsey then used them as the representative of what is normal female sexuality and behavior for the everyday common woman that exist.

So yes ladies, according to Kinsey and his book on female sexuality, your sexuality and sexual behavior is inherently the same as the average incest/rape victim turned crack whore or stripper. Again, wtf?!

Kinsey didn't even have a credible background to be doing studies on human sexuality and sexual behavior to begin with. He wasn't even a psychotherapist, psychiatrist, psychologist, or even a scientist of any sort. He was a zoologist and professor of zoology. So how was was able to get such backing from funding sources, government officials and lawmakers to begin with is beyond me??? It just goes to show how naive and gullible a lot of people were back in the 40s and 50s. We still must be pretty gullible and naive today, because his "research" is being more and more accepted as the foundation to human sexuality. Why are we, as a society, being so ignorant to what the real deal is when it comes to the Kinsey fraud?

Also, Kinsey's research usually only consisted of less than 1,000 people per study group. So consider how many people exist in America in the 1950s when his books were published was close to 200 million, and now this day the U.S. population is over 300 million. Studies based on under 1,000 people who were mostly deviants and predators, are considered valid!? What is wrong with people? (rhetorical)

The Kinsey researchers reveal their incompetence and foolish nature--- this body of material is considered "vital" to human wellness, but yet they did not catalog, sort, or organize it, nor will they respond to it with a data search for a woman who claims to have been sexually abused as a child by a participant. Another issue comes up, can a s child anywhere from 3 months old to under 18 meaningfully give "informed consent" to an adult who sexualizes them? NO, absolutely NOT. There is no such thing as consent from birth to 18 when it comes to an adult getting sexual with a child under 18. There's a reason why the federal legal age of consent law is 18...REAL research and studies have proven again and again that an adult sexualizing a child anywhere under the age of 18, has a lasting long-tern negative effects and consequences on that child's mental, psychological, and emotional well-being and development.

The only benefit Kinsey's research achieved is that it provokes discussion and questions with regards to human sexuality.

As contrived as his "statistics" and "methods" were, however, he did represent, unintentionally of course...something rather profound... And that is the horrible atrocities a person is capable of, really makes one think:

[How] does that apply to or reflect humanity's state, as a whole?

How can such evil have been committed [by one man] and tolerated?

How can we allow even a fraction of the obscenity of that behavior to permeate the same sentence as what we would call our Laws of Justice?

To what capacity can we, each of us, commit evil?

[How] can we prevent such atrocities?

Honestly, it is sad that this individual's sadistic intentions did not entirely die with him; it is sad and horrible that he could have had any effect on what we call justice and openness for human sexuality. It is even sadder that so many suffered because of him, and still will continue to suffer even after his death due to the increased blind acceptance of his "studies" and publications as being the foundation to human sexuality and behavior.

Other than that, Kinsey and his research methods, data, and results are fraud. Under the guise of his connections to some key government officials, lawmakers, and funding sources, Kinsey is guilty of self absorption into inclinations for his own deviant and destructive sexual behavior, rather than for the greater good of mankind and/or the progress of freewill and openness when it comes to human sexuality.