User talk:Alfax

Response

Hmm. That's better. Not perfect, mind you - you'll note that it's been listed for a deletion debate. I suggest you go to that debate and get involved. Ask what you can do to make it better. Work with those who are discussing it. DS (talk) 15:30, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but i see this message after you removed that page. Please follow this talk to deletion article... Alfax (talk) 09:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Livecare Support

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Livecare Support, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.moralnafirma.pl/?title=Livecare_Support. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor note

I made another change to the page. I hope this can be closer to the editing policy.Please contact me if it's not good. Alfax (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protocol

Once a deletion debate has been finished, people rarely consult it again. That's why no one responded to your question: you were a week too late.

That said, I'm going to move Livecare out of mainspace and into your userspace, here - user:Alfax/Livecare Support - so that you can work on it properly. For one thing, you should take care of the copyright issue as soon as possible - it's so similar to the content of moralnafirma.pl as to...

...oh wait. Duh. Moralnafirma is a wikimirror.

Now, as to being 'ad-like'... you may be correct, for all I know, in that other articles for similar products have the same weaknesses as yours. That is not an excuse; rather, it's a reason to hunt down those articles and clean them up as well.

Go look through other articles on software. Find one that you think is well-written, fair, informative, non-promotional. Try to emulate it. Are there any interesting third-party reviews of the program? Has it won any awards? Has it been the subject of any litigation? Is it historically important? How many people and organizations use it?

What is notable about it? DS (talk) 14:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor note

Please explain me better. Please to this page: Comparison of remote desktop software take one of the software listed there.

For example (one of them) GoToMyPC. It's more ADVERTISEMENT than my last page!!

Consider the titles: Technology and business development, Editions and features, Alternatives to GoToMyPC, See also

I removed any mention to "Edition and features". I'm only asking to be mentioned in the comparison list!

Please consider: if the list is NOT an advertisement, it's better to have any product!

Please tell me the phrase you consider advertisement, I remove it! Alfax (talk) 15:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me again: I tried to look up Moralnafirma but I don't understand what I've to do (excuse me but I'm a newbe) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Moralnafirma&go=Go Alfax (talk) 15:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The easiest response first: ignore what I said about "Moralnafirma". Really, I shouldn't have bothered mentioning it. It's an external site that copies Wikipedia content, and a software bot mistakenly thought you had copied from Moralnafirma. The rest, I'll answer soon. DS (talk) 22:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor note

I reduced the "company info" section. I hope it's ok. Alfax (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding User:Alfax/Livecare Support

Hey there. I took a look at the subpage you've been working on. In my opinion, the issue with the article is not one of whether it's promotional or not. The company itself does not satisfy our notability requirements. The article shows that the company exists, but doesn't show any evidence of why that is important to any reader (I should also not that Wikipedia is not a business directory).

You seem like a good contributor. My advice is to work on some already-created articles for a while. I would also read Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:Notability if you have the time / inclination. Those two pages should give you a better idea of what is necessary in order to have an article on this project. Let me know if you have any further questions / concerns / etc. :-) Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor note

Hello, basically I agree with you, but the problem is this page: Comparison of remote desktop software. My concurrent GoToMyPC is published and I think that his page has no many informations than mine!

I'm just saying "I exist". If you want to compare remote desktop products this product exists!

So. If my page is an advertisement, all the product like GoToMyPC have to be removed and the comparison page too..

If my page is not an advertisement (and I believe this) my page have to be there!

Now.. I try to re-write that page. I hope to write it better!Alfax (talk) 14:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor note

Hello, I made some changes. I wait your feedback. Thanks in advice.Alfax (talk) 17:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor note

Hello, I don't know what to do. I have no replies... I have to wait your reply or I can publish my article? thanks. Alfax (talk) 08:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]