User talk:Alf Hasselhoff

Welcome!

Hello, Alf Hasselhoff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --zappa.jak e (talk) 21:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SpVgg Unterhaching‎

You might want to reconsider your approach to this article. Giving a blow-by-blow account of the 2000-01 season may be a little over much for an encyclopedia entry. It makes for a tough read that only the keenest fans might appreciate. --Wiggy! 00:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have comprehensively described their Bundesliga history because it was undoubtedly the biggest success that this club has ever achieved and after which it became known to football fans in other European countries, as the Bundesliga is one of the top five national football leagues on the continent. Besides, their 10th-place finish in the 1999-2000 Bundesliga season and avoidance of relegation in general was voted by football fans as well as experts, like for instance in a Kicker poll in which professional players took part, as the biggest surprise of the season. Prior to the season, people mostly predicted that Unterhaching is going to be relegated as the worst-placed team in the Bundesliga, suffering major defeats to the league's top teams. Their victory over Bayer Leverkusen on the final day of the season was one of the top football news in Europe at the time. The 2000-01 season also needs to be described a little bit more detailed, since they won three out of four matches against their local rivals, achieved their highest victory and suffered their worst defeat as well. Adding results of about ten out of 34 league matches played by the club in the season is far from "giving a blow-by-blow account" as you described it.

I'm not a Haching supporter myself, but I really don't see where is the problem in adding more details about the most successful years in the club's history to an encyclopedic article, which is supposed to be comprehensive. You can see that the information about their years in lower divisions is nothing more than basic, just to let readers know that the club was competing there. If you are not interested in contents of the article, you better just ignore it instead of diminishing its quality by adding or even bringing back removed misspellings like "bobbsledding" or "thier" as well as linking to less important dates and removing links to more important dates, like you did to my two edits concerning the foundation date in the opening lines of the history section. Also, it was quite pointless from you to replace the spelling "bobsleigh" with the North American "bobsled" in an article talking about something European as well as to abbreviate "Spielvereinigung" to "SpVgg" in the first sentence, where the club's full name should be mentioned, even more considering the fact that Haching is often referred to in Germany as Die Spielvereinigung and the full name is also displayed on its logo, while "SpVgg" is merely a common abbreviation used mostly in written works and therefore welcomed in the rest of the article, just like the club's nickname. Their bobsleighing activities should be mentioned in the first sentence as well. You repeatedly reverted all of the aforementioned edits, from both other users and me, with no explanations given. All I wanted is to improve and expand the article, and you disrespected my work like it's some nonsense or vandalism. Jeez! I don't understand what you are trying to achieve with such approach to someone's effort. Every true Bundesliga fan would appreciate someone's effort to expand an article related to the league, regardless of which club they support, instead of complaining and reverting to previous versions of lower quality, giving no explanation for such action. --Alf Hasselhoff 16:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia teams

European U-17 teams plays for international junior (U-17 or U-18) football,
European U-19 teams plays for international youth (U-20) football,
European U-21 teams plays for international olympics (U-23) football.

Matthew_hk t c 07:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, you don't have to tell me what is right, because I have been following Croatian national teams regularly for more than 11 years and during the 1999 World Youth Championship, it was constantly mentioned in Croatian media that their U-21 team, which is commonly referred to as "youth national team" in the country, is playing there. Besides, the Croatian football federation considers those matches as U-21 matches on their official website. If I'm not clear enough now, then I have nothing else to discuss with you on that topic. --Alf Hasselhoff 07:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenal crest on your userpage

I have had to remove the Arsenal crest from your userpage - the Wikipedia policy on Fair Use forbids any inclusion of non-free images on userpages. Sorry. Qwghlm 20:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Croatia football federation.png

Hello, Alf Hasselhoff. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Croatia football federation.png) was found at the following location: User:Alf Hasselhoff. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SpVgg Unterhaching Task Force

Would you like to join the SpVgg Unterhaching Task Force at WikiProject Munich? If you are interested you can sign up here. Kingjeff 01:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:SC_Pfullendorf_logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:SC_Pfullendorf_logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bigr Tex 01:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:TSG_Hoffenheim_logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:TSG_Hoffenheim_logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 02:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kickers_Emden_logo.gif

I have tagged Image:Kickers_Emden_logo.gif as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 02:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SV_Wehen_logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SV_Wehen_logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 20:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:SV_Wehen_logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:SV_Wehen_logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 22:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NK Lokomotiva

Hope you can expand the Stub of the successful club. Matthew_hk t c 06:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FC_Sachsen_Leipzig_logo.gif

I have tagged Image:FC_Sachsen_Leipzig_logo.gif as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. MER-C 12:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TuS_Koblenz_logo.gif

I have tagged Image:TuS_Koblenz_logo.gif as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. MER-C 12:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Karlsruher SC old logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Karlsruher SC old logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Alf Hasselhoff! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 51 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Igor Pamić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Mladost Stadium (Lučani)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mladost Stadium (Lučani). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 31#Mladost Stadium (Lučani) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Polyamorph (talk) 10:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]