User talk:Alextrevelian 006

Welcome!

Hello Alextrevelian 006, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BlankVerse ∅ 14:25, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I was looking at your userboxes and saw that you are gay and single and wished you had a boyfriend. Do you have an email account so that we can talk? Dustihowe (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted a bunch of crap

I dont wanna see my mistakes anymore xD For the record, this are the topics and the posters

Image:Hollywood Sign.jpg

∅ 14:25, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MMGLMk1.jpg

Tronno ( t | c ) 00:32, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MMGLMk1.jpg

C) 18:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Aniger pda.jpg

OrphanBot ~~i cant belive that im such a n00b that a robot needs to remind me of the damm copyrigth tag~~

--ometzit<col> 15:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AA player number

The game's homepage misleads with the "total registered players", because it actually refers to the total number of accounts. However, the older a game, the less that number has meaning. After over four and a half years, the vast majority of accounts is not used anymore. Accounts were abandoned, banned, automatically created, created as an additional account by one player, or never used at all. There are a lot more reasons why this number cannot tell us the actual amount of players. If you want to compare the popularity, simply look here: http://archive.gamespy.com/stats/ For the real amount of players, one might try to combine statistics such as from aaotracker. On the left-hand side in the middle, there's a "Buddylist" which tells us how many players currently playing are registered with aaotracker and how many aren't. Only ~43% are not registered. This service claims to have ~336,000 active registered players. If we add the number of unregistered players, it results in almost half a million regular players. Way too high, because that would mean only 1.2% of the regular players are currently playing and the average time a player plays per day is less than 20 minutes. americasarmy.com even claims 116 h/day in 30days average playtime, which would mean 3.8 hours a day, would it not? This would lead to 37 thousand regular players when combined with the number of currently playing players (I used 6000). Unfortunately, statistics are often wrong or labeled wrong. For example on homepage of aaotracker it reads "those registered players have logged over 3 BILLION player rounds, nearly 2 million player hours, and over 1100 Fan Sites have registered for our community listing." A player is lucky to play 15 rounds in an hour, but 1500 rounds/hour is nonsense. I personally estimate the true number of active players between 40 and 70 thousand players. Hope I could help you. --Theodore Witness 22:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:Image:Aniger pda.jpg

Your request is pending on deletion review. The review will normally run for five days. If you need it more urgently, why? GRBerry 02:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alex. Thanks for the kind note, but it was actually User:Dragons flight who undeleted Image:Aniger pda.jpg. Credit where it's due! Best wishes, Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. -- MarcoTolo 03:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colombian peso

It looks like you're going to upload some images. Just a kind reminder, if you upload image to Commons, the same image can be used on Wikipedia of all languages. Thanks. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 01:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The images are in commons to use them in eswiki. also the original file is also in commons--ometzit<col> 01:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ummmmmmm i had no idea that the currency infobox existed that would save me the whole afternoon i spend doing that table lol. but thnks for doing it (Ummmmmmmmm)--ometzit<col> 03:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you're an expert on Colombian matters. May I point you to Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style/Currency article. It has detail example and guide for currency articles. Your help is definitely appreciated. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 03:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

K310 Article

Thanks for re-designing the K310 article... with my limited english skill I can only able to make a short one. Good Job!

Ali Wardhana 09:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kirby WikiProject

I've formed a WikiProject dedicated to the improvement of Kirby articles. If you're interested in participating, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Kirby's Dream Land. Thank you. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to National University of Colombia

Your recent edit to that page have unsourced claims. So, per WP:SOURCE, it must be removed.Canaima 23:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Mike B. Anderson; George Maciunas; Jet age; Colombian Liberal Party; Maria Full of Grace; BBMak; Aspirator; Polyphonic ringtone; Mario Laserna Pinzón; The Day the Earth Stood Stupid; Colombian presidential election, 2006; Selective fire; Bender Gets Made; Collateral Damage (film); Personal defense weapon; Proof of Life; Pollux (star); The Band Concert; National police

Cleanup: I Dated a Robot; Anthology of Interest II; Colombian Constitution of 1991
Merge: Unfabulous; Young; Mass in special relativity
Add Sources: Hospitality service; Social network service; Ernesto Samper
Wikify: Moe's Tavern; Jerky Boys; Christa Schröder
Expand: Luis Carlos Galán; Carlos Lehder; Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 07:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uribe

I suggest you add the copyedit corrections made by 72.78.187.193, which you removed when reverted quite far back. They make sense and do not seem to be related to the other anonymous IP. In the meantime, I will keep the page on watch and would semiprotect if there is more trouble. Saludos, --Asterion^talk 21:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I think it´s done, please tell me if somethings is missing.--ometzit<col> 01:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV

Hola. Gracias para reportar 200.118.51.112 a WP:AIV. Vi que tendrás un error con la plantilla. Usaste el texto	Hi. Thanks for reporting 200.118.51.112 to WP:AIV. I noticed you are using the reporting template incorrectly. You used the code:
`{{vandal\|User:200.118.51.112}}: Edition on the [[Alvaro Uribe]], adding of libelous comments. He is the same User:200.105.54.149 who was blocked yesterday for the same edits after violating 3 revert rule.--[[User:Alextrevelian 006\|ometzit<col>]] 21:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)`
pero es mejor usar:	but it is better to use:
`{{ipvandal\|200.118.51.112}}: Edition on the [[Alvaro Uribe]], adding of libelous comments. He is the same User:200.105.54.149 who was blocked yesterday for the same edits after violating 3 revert rule.--[[User:Alextrevelian 006\|ometzit<col>]] 21:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)`
—dgies^t_c 21:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another format

Is there any other format that I can use for audio files? WavePad cant save my file in ogg (i have the codec, i just dont know why its not letting me save it)--ometzit<col> 04:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:AUDIO, I don't think so. Real96 04:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you must use OGG. You can save as WAV and then go here to get a program to convert it to OGG. —dgies^t_c 04:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys that worked: --ometzit<col> 04:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Emo.gif

Thanks for uploading this image, but how do you know it's a free image. Please state a source saying that it's free in the image description, or I will have to report it for copyright violation. Thanks. --Steevven1 ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery)} 02:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It´s from one of those pages that offer these kind of gif without restrictions. i have it already for some time, but i dont remember where do i get it hit emo animations or something like that and see if u can find it. compare with the gif obtained from http://www.gifs.net/ that User:DVD_R_W have in his page.--ometzit<col> 04:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suzy Kolber

Generally, links to blogs are inappropriate per WP:EL, even if the title is related to the subject of the article. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 03:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Banned Books.

I think that the edits you reverted from List of banned books was legit. I have reverted and sourced them. Jvbishop 12:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo.

Whats up? You seem cool.

Yo. 2

Currently hitting up*

Deletion of Page

Can any available admin delete the subpage User:Alextrevelian_006/The_Selector? I was using it to start a article and improve it a little bit before submitting, but the info was kinda easy to find so I end up submitting it as The Selector and leaving it as a stub. Thanks! --ometzit<col> 03:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I asked User:JohnReaves on IRC and he deleted it for you. Cheers. Real96 03:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOSDAB

I'm following disambiguation guidelines. Specifically this part... Each bulleted entry should, in almost every case, have exactly one navigable (blue) link. Including more than one link can confuse the reader; including no links at all makes the entry useless for further navigation. Mahanga^Talk 16:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MySpace Features

I'm glad you like the MySpace Events page. I know that you want to put a TV on demand page but i think it would be appropriate somwhere else and would like you to start MySpace Features for more info go to the discussion page of MySpace Events. Martini833 02:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well a MySpace features page it would be really advertising, cuz at the end the TV on demand it´s advertising. However, i would agree with a Myspace features section in the myspace page. I agree with the MySpace features because it´s remarkable the use of internet to promote underground artist and stuff, but yeah the features deserve a subsection, a whole page it would be treated as advertising --ometzit<col> 02:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Emo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Emo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 08:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Emo.gif

Image:Emo.gif: Since you are refusing to provide info, the image is deleted. `'mikka 04:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for temporal undeletion

I need a temporary undeletion of the file Image:Emo.gif, in order to get myself a backup. BTW, I know that this is not the use of the helpme template.--ometzit<col> 01:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that would be allowed, but you can try speaking to the admin who deleted the file (In this case, Mikkalai) or if that doesn't work, you can try a Deletion Review. For that reason, though, I'm afraid you may be out of luck. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 02:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bogota_45_con_7.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bogota_45_con_7.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Angry face.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Angry face.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect Hips dont lie

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hips dont lie, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hips dont lie is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hips dont lie, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The_passion_of_the_jew.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The_passion_of_the_jew.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 02:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:La ponti.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:La ponti.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:SebuscaBush.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:SebuscaBush.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 16:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bloc Party - Helicopter.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloc Party - Helicopter.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your account has been blocked for one month for violating Wikipedia's BLP policy on Twink (gay slang). A simple glance at the edit history or the talk page of the article would have shown you that adding an image of a person who has not self-identified as a homosexual, let alone a twink, is unacceptable. Neıl 龱 18:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} First, adding the image again was made thinking about a possible accidental deletion. Second, in short, the image describe someone who falls in the description of a twink person. According to the Encyclopedia of Homosexuality by W.R. Dynes and the Aaron´s Dictionary of Gay Terms, twink is not limited to gay persons, it is just a term to describe someone who falls in a exact description. The image comes from flickr, and given there are no more articles linked to the file, it is fair to assume the only use given to the file was using it for this exact article. Also, the flickr account linked to the article is full with males in clearly gay situations so it is also fair to assume the person in the file in question, is also gay. Finally, a month of block is too much of abuse of power for re adding a picture which, first I thought it was a accidental erasing and second, I believe it should be. There is some way to complain about admin abuse of power? I don´t understant what it say here

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Using the image int that context is indeed incorrect, however, blocking a productive editor with no warning for a month for one edit is even more so

Request handled by: Prodego ^talk 04:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At first glance, this appears to be very excessive. I don't see that Alex has edited the article before this single change (or, at least, since March 2006). I don't see evidence that Alex has had any problems in this area, before, nor that they were warned, nor that they were even notified their edit was objectionable. They appear to be a diligent editor in otherwise fine standing, and have been contributing to Wikipedia since 2005. What on earth called for a block at all, here, much less such a ridiculously long one? – Luna Santin (talk) 04:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let civility reign

Hi there, I can understand your frustration at being blocked without warning, for an excessive duration. But please do not use personal attacks much like Well you SoaB if you would ask me first before block me... this one. Also while the Family Guy reference of "the power of Christ compels you, bitch!" is funny, it also seems rather out of line considering the commentary preceding it "Ok, after a blocking that was notice by several people as a clear admin abuse of power". Please do not attack other editors, for any reason. Thanks and happy editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archaea

Hi there, might you have time to look this article over and see if you have any suggestions or can catch any mistakes? Tim Vickers (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kirby Super Star.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kirby Super Star.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. [[User:BJBot|BJBot] ] (talk) 05:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About a new wikiproject

He visto que tú has sido quien puso un ejemplo de la canción Molinos de viento, en el artículo Mägo de Oz. Así que pienso que quizás, estés interesado en la creación del Wikiproyecto Mägo de Oz. Un saludo --El estremeñu (talk) 23:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Joe Arroyo - Tania.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Joe Arroyo - Tania.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Banrep Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Banrep Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:48, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colombia Collaboration Invitation

		WikiProject Colombia
		You have been invited to participate in Collaboration of the Month to improve and standardize the List of Presidents of Colombia in hopes of raising it to featured list status.

mijotoba (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Colombia Collaboration Invitation

		WikiProject Colombia
		You have been invited to participate in Collaboration of the Month to improve and standardize the List of Presidents of Colombia in hopes of raising it to featured list status.

mijotoba (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00024.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DSC00024.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Inthewomb 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Inthewomb 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Inthewomb 3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Inthewomb 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Inthewomb 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Inthewomb 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biblio2.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Biblio2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:34, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Can you help verify translations of articles from Spanish

Hello Alextrevelian 006,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Spanish to English Wikipedia?

File:Language icon.svg

This would involve evaluating a translated article on the English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Spanish article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Spanish , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Spanish. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Spanish article, and assess them "Pass" or "Fail" (the {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} templates may be useful here). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then assessing it, that's even better, but it isn't required.) Also please note that we are assessing accuracy not completeness, so if the English article is much shorter that is okay, as long as whatever has been translated so far is factually accurate.

If you can help, please {{ping}} me here to let me know. You can add your pass/fails above, right next to each link, or you may indicate your results below. Thanks! Elinruby (talk) 05:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of File:Biblio3.JPG

The file File:Biblio3.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:25, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:EAST Reactor Photo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EAST Reactor Photo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Shizhao (talk) 07:04, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Banrep edif.jpg

The file File:Banrep edif.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bogota 45 con 7.JPG

The file File:Bogota 45 con 7.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Panic at the disco - I Write sins, not tragedies.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Panic at the disco - I Write sins, not tragedies.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18A:C781:F800:3CA0:F533:E655:1589 (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of In the Womb

The article In the Womb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to pass notability guidelines. Tagged since 2020. Nothing in a BEFORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of In the Womb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In the Womb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the Womb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 03:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]