User talk:Alexthebob

September 2017

Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Vincent of Lérins— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 16:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC) I had intercourse with a cow. MOO.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Alexthebob/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 16:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Alexthebob, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jupitus Smart 16:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1948 Donora smog. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 1948 Donora smog was changed by Alexthebob (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959695 on 2017-09-18T18:03:52+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1948 Donora smog, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox PAhistoric I HAD INTERCOURSE WITH A COW! MOOOOOOOOOO!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Infobox PAhistoric I HAD INTERCOURSE WITH A COW! MOOOOOOOOOO!, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 18:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1948 Donora smog. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 18:10, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alexthebob/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Alexthebob/sandbox, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 19:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]