User talk:Alexoneill1469

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.

A minor issue: the term "corporeal" is actually used in various texts, e.g. Harry Wolfson, Foundations of religious philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Harvard University Press, 1962 states:

"The divine spirit in the latter sense is thus an incorporeal soul or mind..."

So removing it from the Holy Spirit page may not be a good idea. I suggest that you modify that edit to work that back in and then somehow figure out that passage. Cheers History2007 (talk) 23:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minqi Li

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Minqi Li, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Minqi_Li. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have tagged this for deletion because I don't believe it meets the criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please note that simply being an author or teacher does not mean that a person is worthy of mention here. Please let me know if you have any questions (you can reply below). Thanks. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 22:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Minqi Li

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Minqi Li. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 23:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]