User talk:Alexmilt
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Изабела II краљица Шпаније article, but since this is the English Wikipedia, we cannot accept text in other languages. However, if this is an original article, perhaps you would like to translate it into English.
If you want to contribute in the Serbian language, your contributions are more than welcome at the sr:Serbian Wikipedia. If you wish to have an article from the Serbian Wikipedia translated into English, make a request at Wikipedia:Translation.
You may also enjoy becoming a part of Wikipedia's effort to coordinate across different languages.
For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing!
File copyright problem with File:H1N1 Serbia.svg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:H1N1 Serbia.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 20:52, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Hi there! I saw that you are edit-warring in Burrel. Please use the talk page to discuss any changes or you'll be reverted. --Sulmues talk 18:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Cultural Property of Great Importance
[edit]Thanks for joining project! See Project main page for more information, or ask me! All best!
 | This user participates in WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia. |
You may use it on your page, or just leave it here! :) --Tadijaspeaks 19:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Vote
[edit]You must explain your vote in few sentences, so your vote will be more valid then now. --Tadijaspeaks 13:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Kosare
[edit]I can at least putt Russian Volunteers, if that's a good oneVJ-Yugo (talk) 23:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
FR Yugoslav Strike Mission
[edit]Then if Zivota Duric had a damaged J-22 Orao, then it's probably true that a KLA anti-aircraft insurgent shot it, but the aircraft was coming to a fall and the pilot was maneuvering it to ram into enemy aircraft then. No NATO interaction with J-22 Orao's and NATO aircraft happened and so yes, the KLA insurgent shot it down VJ-Yugo (talk) 00:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
At least I have on idea on my mind, lets start one page of the pilot killed in action, Lt. Col. Zivota Duric — Preceding unsigned comment added by VJ-Yugo (talk • contribs) 00:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm just saying because it really intrests me, I have never heard of the FR Yugoslav Armed Forces used the air force also instead of ground forces or, I really don't know if they even used battleships too, don't blame me for that one. Also, some of the KLA troops do have some MANPADS right? I just made the article because it was an inside mission executed during the war, but they did weaken the KLA power. If you think that the KLA wasn't weakened because it was pretty powerful in the Battle of Kosare, I will tell you, 'They were weakened, its just that they had some support in the Battle of Kosare and that's why they took our outpost, but all in all, they lost because their strategic goal was not achieved and the FR Yugoslav Army pulled on some successful tactics, even in the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, NATO did not win, but we Tactically won because we made decoys, that is a tactic according to the documentary, Lessons of Kosovo. I don't see any contributors having the feeling of watching it. VJ-Yugo (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Well, I like the idea of putting it on Serbian Wikipedia, but I would it also if every country had like all their commanders and memorable pilots who fought in a war in the Mother Wikipedia, which is this wikipedia were both on, also, my Serbian is like really good, but like, I don't have the feeling to like put our Cyrillic alphabet on the page always. I don't even have a Serbian keyboard and I can't click always. But, you can do the writing while I will put in the pictures and markings (Any medals he won, air force allegiance SFR Yugoslav Air Force, FR Yugoslav Air Force), also his date of birth and many more info, if you can find it for me. But you do have a great idea and great following. VJ-Yugo (talk) 00:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
This is in Serbian of the second comment I posted as you wished. Ја само говорим зато што ме је заиста интрестс, никада нисам чуо СР Војске Југославије употребе Ратног ваздухопловства и уместо копнених снага. Ја стварно не знам да ли чак користио превише бојних бродова, немојте ме кривити за то једно. Такође, неки од припадника ОВК имају неке ручним ракетним зар не? Управо сам направио чланак, јер је био у мисији погубљени током рата, али су слабе снаге ОВК. Ако мислите да ОВК није била ослабљена јер с тим што се прилично моћан у бици код Косаре, ја ћу вам рећи. То ће бити о бици код Косаре, "Они су били ослабљени у току мисије, њене само да је у бици код Косаре су имали подршку у борби са НАТО-ом, француске Легије странаца, као и Албаније и зато што је наш предстража, али све у свему, они су изгубили јер им је стратешки циљ није био постигнут и СР Војске Југославије повукла на неке успешне тактике, чак и у 1999 НАТО бомбардовања Југославије, НАТО није победио, али смо освојили Тактички јер смо мамаца, то је тактика према документарни филм, лекције Косова. Ја не видим никакву сарадници имају осећај да посматра. You can read the Cyrillic right, just asking. VJ-Yugo (talk) 00:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
I copied and pasted this from google translate. VJ-Yugo (talk) 00:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
But... You do understand, most of what I have said, and the planning of the new page? You can do the Serbian part and if you want, I can help you with the biographical box. Then I will do, the English, the whole article. You understand now right? VJ-Yugo (talk) 01:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Did you do the new page yet? VJ-Yugo (talk) 04:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Re: Knife
[edit]I saw your question on WhiteWriter's talk page, and I think I know what the problem is.
sr:Nož has interwiki links to en:Dagger (and equivalent translations in other languages, such as sh:Bodež), not to en:Knife. The bot keeps on fixing the articles, so that it maintains 1:1 mapping/ Looking at the contents of sr:Nož, it really focuses on bodež (bodež je 'hladno oružje', nož je 'alatka'). So, there are two solutions:
- Rename sr:Nož to sr:Bodež. Make a new article, sr:Nož and interlink that with en:Knife. This is the solution I prefer.
- Fix all interwiki links in sr:Nož to point to en:Knife & co, i.e. copy/paste the list of links from en:Knife.
Regards, No such user (talk) 10:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
I've got no idea, everything seems OK -- it only did it once, so it will hopefully stick by now. No such user (talk) 12:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
File:H1N1 Serbia.svg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:H1N1 Serbia.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Please see
[edit]As you participated in discusion before, please see here the last proposition. Thanks! --WhiteWriter speaks 22:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
An invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska
[edit]| WikiProject Republika Srpska | ||
|---|---|---|
 WikiProject Republika Srpska currently covers a total of 0 articles and 0 other related pages on the English Wikipedia. | ||
| We look forward to welcoming you to the project! |
--Anulmanul (talk) 21:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Alexmilt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alexmilt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alexmilt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Montenegrin municipal elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)