User talk:Alexisrael

Welcome!

Hello Alexisrael, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! HGB 01:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 41.116.205.145 (talk) 18:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Globerman

Hi Alex. In response to your email, I don't know anything about Ashley, but I came across the article about her while browsing the list of new pages. —Brim 04:51, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Alex baby 41.116.205.145 (talk) 18:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You did not answer me baby Sexy 41.116.205.145 (talk) 18:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Anna bauman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anna bauman.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. Thue | talk 11:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Marcos Baghdatis images

Hi, I have marked the images that you uploaded, Image:Marcos baghdatis 2.jpg and Image:Marcos baghdatis.jpg, as copyright violations or "copyvios". Please provide some evidence that they are "copyrighted free use" as you marked, or are available under some other free license, as I find it highly unlikely that Getty Images and the Australian Open have actuall provided them this way. You can comment on their copyright status on this page: Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 January 29. Otherwise, they will probably be deleted. Thanks, pfctdayelise 13:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with you 41.116.205.145 (talk) 18:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Yael bar zohar.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Yael bar zohar.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 02:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most of your images seems to lack source info (and have inapropriate tagging). Please fix ASAP, otherwise most of your images will end up deleted. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 03:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay baby 41.116.205.145 (talk) 18:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Shiri_maimon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shiri_maimon.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 09:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Amir_hadad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Amir_hadad.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 09:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you are welcome 41.116.205.145 (talk) 18:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Amos_mansdorf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Amos_mansdorf.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 09:42, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Noam okun.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Noam okun.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 21:11, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Patty schnyder.jpg

Hi Alexisrael. It would be great, if you could move this picture to Commons. Like this, it could be included in articles in other wikipedias. Thanks in advance. --Lucido 23:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Frank dancevic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frank dancevic.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Anna_chakvetadze.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Anna_chakvetadze.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. pfctdayelise (talk) 11:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Igor_kunitsyn.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Igor_kunitsyn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. pfctdayelise (talk) 11:28, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Patty_schnyder.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Patty_schnyder.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. pfctdayelise (talk) 11:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yulia_beygelzimer.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Yulia_beygelzimer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. pfctdayelise (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: tennis pictures

If they were taken by you, why do they have such low resolution? Why don't you upload the original large files? Why don't they have EXIF data? Why don't you have dozens of photos, including non-"stars", from the same tournament? --pfctdayelise (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If they are your photos, this is what you should do:

go to the image page and look for a link at the bottom that says "Upload a new version of this file"
follow it, and upload the original hi-res files with metadata, with the summary 'original hi-res file' (or something similar)
on the image page, revert back to the cropped version
edit the image pages to give better summaries than "self made". Try something like "Player X at the X Tournament in X Location on X Date".

If you do these things then your photos will be tons more useful. This is what I do, for example look at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Amer_Delic_2007_Australian_Open_mens_doubles_R1.jpg under the file history, you can see the first one I uploaded was 2304×3456 and the one currently showing is 510×830.

You should also upload to Commons:, then your photos can be automatically used in all language versions of Wikipedia, whereas if you upload them here only English Wikipedia can use them.

--pfctdayelise (talk) 03:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also here is a link to your Gallery.

You know 49 pictures uploaded by you have been deleted. Don't you even care about those if you actually took them? pfctdayelise (talk) 03:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GREAT!! Now I don't have any problem. thankyou! The descriptions are better too.

When you account is older than 4 days, you can upload the crop versions over the top by the "Upload a new version of this image" link at the bottom of the image page.

I'm going to create a category for your pictures on Commons. pfctdayelise (talk) 00:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you know how to use categories now? If not I can show you again. pfctdayelise (talk) 10:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 00:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Harel levy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Harel levy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Army_men_rts.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Army_men_rts.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lihi Alon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lihi Alon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

"This article appears to be totally unreferenced biography of a living person. Please remove this tag only if you can provide at lest one source AND you believe the subject to be otherwise encyclopedic"

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 10:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Alexisrael! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 88 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Galit Gutmann - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Moran Eizenstein - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dudi Sela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrey Kuznetsov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Suffern High School. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Exactly what is unique about this school's graduation and how does a picture of a gym full of kids illustrate that? Also, what is unique about this school's tennis court over any other school's tennis court? No one is saying that the captioning on the photos are false; just that they are bad choices for illustrating this article. Illustrations should either illustrate a particular point in the text (and text saying that the school has a graduation or a tennis court would be just as irrellevent as the photos) or illustrate something uniquely identifying the school. For example, a picture of the school itself, which is already in the article, or a picture of the school's sign. Also, an article should have a number of pictures that is relative to the size of the article. For an article this size, unless there is something about the school that could be much better shown with a picture than text, one is plenty. Feel free to start a discussion on the article's talk page. Pretty much, the commentary added here to this warning template will be my reply, and I am pretty sure my opinion will be mirrored by most experienced school article editors. John from Idegon (talk) 22:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alexisrael. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]