User talk:Alexey-spb

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexey-spb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never used so different user the same time and if i am so quiet because I do not know very well work with Wikipedia and i need a help as how to decide my problem with user Moonriddengirl ! Please who is reading this message help me. thanks

Decline reason:

As mentioned below, you need to discuss your alternate accounts, why you used them, and that you understand why it's not allowed. TN X Man 21:20, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexey-spb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexey-spb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i hope to leave wiki forever but before it, just i need to change my talk page!

Decline reason:

Completely invalid reason to request unblock. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock}} (Alexey-spb (talk) 22:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexey-spb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here

Decline reason:

No reason given for unblocking. Moreover, this account is Confirmed by CheckUser, along with three other accounts, as engaging in sock puppetry. –MuZemike 21:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

Your new account, User:Editorika, has now been blocked. You may not create new accounts to use to edit while your account is blocked. This is block evasion, and it may lead to the indefinite blocking of this main account. All the edits of your new account have been undone, as you are not welcome to edit Wikipedia while your account is blocked. If you want to try to get your account unblocked, you need to follow the procedure described above. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

.

If you wish to continue contributing to Wikipedia, you will need to negotiate an unblock of your primary account. Any content added by any sock puppets may be deleted. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taleshi Hava

The article Taleshi Hava has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable composition

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why? I Ask (talk) 11:18, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Baluch

The article The Baluch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, fails WP:GNG and

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NotAGenious (talk) 13:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]