User talk:Alexandr.borchard/sandbox

Alex's peer review

What you have so far for your lead looks fine. I don't know enough about the site to tell if there's anything else that you should add, but I think you're good to go. The wording of your sections is a little awkward, though. It's hard to find a good balance between casual and academic writing, so that's to be expected. You section on how the website functions is good. My only real suggestion is to elaborate more on how people have reacted to the website, because with something like this that's where you're going to get the most content. -Miranda england (talk) 16:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article. I must admit, my draft is nowhere near done. I only typed out my information the way I did just to get it written out. Fortunately, not all my information is in my sandbox yet so I will have more information to post for the article. I have information on how the website functions and how people can use it. I will certainly work on correcting my wording. I am trying to make it more academic so I will analyze how I am writing. Alexandr.borchard (talk) 16:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]