User talk:Alexander Rohner

November 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Autophagy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Autophagy was changed by Alexander Rohner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.896584 on 2015-11-16T08:44:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! there. While adding information, please use appropriate source(s), otherwise it is not a legit edit, as you did at Piwi-interacting RNA. And also use citation appropriately, e.g., your edits at DNA and autophagy do not make a meaningful information.

Perhaps, you might like to read first how to write an article and style of writing before you venture further. Chhandama (talk) 09:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at autophagy was "[Autophagy plays an important role in cancer – both in protecting against cancer as well as potentially contributing to the growth of cancer.] and may in these cases occur in the nucleus."[Emphases are your words.] Firstly, you did not even remove the period, making it a fragmentary sentence. Secondly, autophagy does not occur in the nucleus. What your source is saying is that it does initiate signal transduction that degrades the lamin proteins on the inside of the nuclear envelope.

Thanks for your comments, will do my best to improve

Your edit at Piwi-interacting RNA was "piRNAs remain one of the most enigmatic of all silencing-inducing small RNAs because of their complexity and singularity." Firstly, you did not cite any source, and it is a bold statement. Secondly, phrasing one of the most enigmatic is clearly a peacock statement, not endorsed by Wikipedia. You could have just say, "piRNAs are one of the most complex silencing-inducing small RNAs." Period. Yes, supporting it with a verifiable citation would not harm. Chhandama (talk) 03:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]