User talk:Alexander Mak

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Alexander Mak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

213.140.6.120 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

edit-warring on Skopje

Blocking administrator: Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 23:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexander Mak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why im i been blocked?

Decline reason:

The reason given for you blocking was for edit warring a the article Skopje, it will expire 24 hours after it was placed. — ((1 == 2) ? (('Stop') : ('Go')) 03:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexander Mak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why im i been blocked?

Decline reason:

No reason to unblock has been stated. — Raymond Arritt 02:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No reason for blocking has been stated either.

Blocked again

I've blocked you again, since you have immediately renewed the same lame revert-war on Skopje, both with this account and your IP (which also has several previous blocks for the same reason). Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you actually read any of my posts? Future Perfect at Sunrise? I -can- easily change IP, but, is there a sense to all this? If so many people protest, it means that there is somthing mor than just a "lame revert-war on Skopje" you as wiki moderator should know this best Fut.Perf... And what kind of moderator has -no- email ??? Alexander Makedon 13:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? My e-mail is activated. Yours isn't. If you want to contact me, go to "My preferences", enter your own e-mail, follow the usual confirmation e-mail, then go here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

O.o who made you a moderator? Wiki is this man in the right place? I have an e-mail active, i have had it for a wile... O.o i have even posted things to other moderators... i mean really are you in the right place?

Sorry, check yours again. Mine is functional; other people have mailed me just today. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Alexander Mak for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- Avg 23:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per this SSP case, you've been blocked 48 hours and Alex Makedon indef. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing the same articles with your new account, beginning only two minutes after you abandoned your old account, does not meet the "clean start" criteria at WP:SOCK. Your new account will remain blocked indefinitely, you must use this account (Alexander Mak) to edit Wikipedia. Lyrl^Talk _C 22:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]